Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975552›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

How do pregnant women's perceptions of obstetric forceps change according to their demographic background: a cross sectional study.

Jasmine M Hitt, Angela S Martin, Jordan E Dietrich, Natasha Ahmed, Gene T Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Maternal-fetal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes in an intensive control program].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmine M HittDepartment of OBGYN, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, USA.
Angela S MartinDepartment of OBGYN, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, USA.
Jordan E DietrichDepartment of OBGYN, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, USA.
Natasha AhmedDepartment of OBGYN, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, USA.
Gene T LeeDepartment of OBGYN, The University of Kansas Health System, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, USA. glee@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-1000
University of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's attitudes towards obstetric forceps likely contribute to declining use and opportunities for residency training, but formal documentation of women's attitudes towards obstetric forceps is currently limited. A clearer understanding should help guide our attempts to preserve its use in modern obstetrics and to improve residency training. Our objective is to document women's attitudes towards obstetric forceps and the influence basic demographic variables have on those attitudes.

methodsA cross sectional study was performed. We developed a one-time anonymous structured 5-question survey that was given to all women with low-risk pregnancies presenting to our medical center for prenatal care between October 2018-December 2018. The questionnaire asked for the woman's self-reported age, race, education level and insurance type. The five questions were as follows: (1) Do you think forceps should be used to deliver babies, (2) Is forceps safe for the baby, (3) Is forceps safe for the mother, (4) Do you think forceps can help to lower the cesarean section rate, (5) Do you think physicians in training should learn to place forceps on a real patient. We calculated means and proportions for the responses according to the overall group and various subgroups. Statistical analysis included Kruskall-Wallis or Mann-Whitney tests as appropriate. Results were also adjusted by regression using a Generalized Linear Model. Power calculation showed sample size of 384 was required.

resultsA total of 499 women returned the questionnaire. Response rate was 56.8% (499/878). The findings suggest that women's perceptions towards forceps are generally negative. Women with white ethnicity, college education or higher and private insurance did have more favorable views than their counterparts, but the majority still had unfavorable views. Age was not shown to have a significant effect on maternal attitude.

conclusionWomen's views towards forceps use in the University of Kansas Medical Center are negative and may be contributing to the decline of its use. Improving women's perceptions of forceps would require multiple different strategies rather than a single focused easily-implemented message. If forceps training continues, such training will rely on a minority of women who will accept forceps use in childbirth.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthObstetrical ForcepsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyPregnancyPregnant PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesObstetric forcepsOperative vaginal deliveryPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33975552
PMCPMC8111760
OpenAlexW3161835669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.