Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975447›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases: A Potential Strategy for Improving Cell Transplantation for Nervous System Repair.

Yu-Ting Tseng, Mo Chen, James St John, Jenny Ekberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu-Ting TsengMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Mo ChenMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
James St JohnMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Jenny EkbergMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-4966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell transplantation shows promise for repair of the injured nervous system, including spinal cord injury (SCI) and peripheral nerve injury (PNI). There are, however, still problems hampering these therapies moving from bench to bedside, and the methods need optimization. Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems are suggested to improve outcomes, bridging the gap between the in vitro and in vivo environments. In such constructs, cells are allowed to interact with each other and with the extracellular matrix (ECM) in 3D as they do in vivo. Transplanting cells in 3D constructs, rather than in suspension, is thought to promote cell survival and maintain important cellular behaviors. One such critical behavior is cell migration into and within the injury site. Understanding and controlling the migratory capability of 3D-cultured cells is therefore pivotal for developing better transplantation techniques. ECM remodelling can influence numerous cellular functions, including cell migration and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are important enzymes for ECM modulation. Here, we discuss the idea of modulating MMPs to control cell migration in 3D culture systems, which can improve the therapeutic potential of cells transplanted in 3D.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MovementCell TransplantationHumansMatrix MetalloproteinasesRatsMatrix Metalloproteinases3D cultureextracellular matrixmigrationMMPsOlfactory ensheathing cellsperipheral nervespinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33975447
PMCPMC8120536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.