Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975347›Full record

ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021

Robotic open-thoracotomy-view approach using vertical port placement and confronting monitor setting.

Noriaki Sakakura, Takeo Nakada, Suguru Shirai, Hirotomo Takahara, Keita Nakanishi, Takuya Matsui, Harushi Ueno, Yusuke Takahashi, Hiroaki Kuroda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Any ports in a storm.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noriaki SakakuraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeo NakadaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Suguru ShiraiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hirotomo TakaharaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Keita NakanishiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takuya MatsuiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Harushi UenoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki KurodaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRobotic lung resections (RLRs) are conventionally performed using look-up views of the thorax from the caudal side. To conduct RLR with views similar to those in open thoracotomy, we adopted a vertical port placement and confronting upside-down monitor setting, which we called robotic 'open-thoracotomy-view approach'. We herein present our experience of this procedure.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 58 patients who underwent RLR (43 with lobectomy; 15 with segmentectomy) with 3-arm open-thoracotomy-view approach using the da Vinci Surgical System between February 2019 and October 2020. The patient cart was rolled in from the left cranial side of the patient regardless of the side to be operated on. Robotic ports were vertically placed along the axillary line, and 2 confronting monitors and 2 assistants were positioned on each side of the patient. The right-side monitor, which was set up for the left-side assistant to view, projected the upside-down image of the console surgeon's view.

resultsAll procedures were safely performed. The median duration of surgery and console operation was 215 and 164 min, respectively. Emergency conversion into thoracotomy and severe morbidities did not occur, and the median postoperative hospitalization duration was 3 days. In all procedures, the console surgeon and 2 assistants had direct 'bird-eye' views of the cranially located intrathoracic structures and instrument tips, which are sometimes undetectable with the conventional look-up view.

conclusionsThe open-thoracotomy-view approach setting is a possible option for RLR. It offers natural thoracotomy views and can circumvent some of the known limitations of the conventional procedure.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansRetrospective StudiesThoracotomyConfronting monitorsOpen-thoracotomy-view approachRobotic lung resectionVertical port placement

Identifiers

PMID33975347
PMCPMC8759507
OpenAlexW3161983040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.