Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975127›Full record

ArticleMutation research

Recruitment of MRE-11 to complex DNA damage is modulated by meiosis-specific chromosome organization.

Kailey Harrell, Madison Day, Sarit Smolikove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kailey HarrellDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52241, USA.
Madison DayDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52241, USA.
Sarit SmolikoveDepartment of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52241, USA. Electronic address: sarit-smolikove@uiowa.edu.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
An organismal approach to dissecting the mechanism of DSB repair pathway choiceR01GM112657 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SMOLIKOVE, SARIT · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112657NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most dangerous assaults on the genome, and yet their natural and programmed production are inherent to life. When DSBs arise close together they are particularly deleterious, and their repair may require an altered form of the DNA damage response. Our understanding of how clustered DSBs are repaired in the germline is unknown. Using laser microirradiation, we examine early events in the repair of clustered DSBs in germ cells within Caenorhabditis elegans. We use precise temporal resolution to show how the recruitment of MRE-11 to complex damage is regulated, and that clustered DNA damage can recruit proteins from various repair pathways. Abrogation of non-homologous end joining or COM-1 attenuates the recruitment of MRE-11 through distinct mechanisms. The synaptonemal complex plays both positive and negative regulatory roles in these mutant contexts. These findings indicate that MRE-11 is regulated by modifying its accessibility to chromosomes.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChromosomesDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairDNA, HelminthMeiosisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA, Helminthmre-11 protein, C elegansC. elegansComplex damage/DNA repairMeiosisMicroirradiationSynaptonemal complex

Identifiers

PMID33975127
PMCPMC8176624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.