ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2021
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials.
Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimal clinically important differences in patient-reported outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery in the arterial revascularization trial.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024Trial
- Perioperative outcomes and quality of life after minimally invasive versus median sternotomy left ventricular assist device implantation: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the body-related distress scale for obesity (BDS-O): a patient-reported outcome measure for Chinese population with obesity.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- The Equity Deficit in Revascularization Research: Patient Perspectives Emphasize the Need for Inclusive, Patient-Centered Outcomes.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Statistical analysis of Likert-based ordinal scales: a guide for clinical trialists.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Instruments Used to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Valvular Heart Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Adding the patient perspective: the necessity of patient reported outcomes in cardiac surgery clinical trials.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025Review
- Validity and Reproducibility of the Six-Minute Stepper Test in Cardiac Patients.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Win Ratio in Biomedical Science: A Bibliometric Analysis.CJC open · 2025Review
- 2024 Update on Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- "It Attracts Your Eyes and Brain": Refining Visualizations for Shared Decision-Making with Heart Failure Patients.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Adults with Fontan Circulatory Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Identifying Existing Guidelines, Frameworks, Checklists, and Recommendations for Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Perceptions of patient-reported outcome data access and sharing among patients with heart failure: ethical implications for research.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2024Article
- Patient reported outcomes measures are infrequently used in clinical studies of heart transplant recipients.JHLT open · 2023Article
- What Really Matters to Survivors of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection-A Survey of Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Dutch National Aortic Dissection Advocacy Group.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Care Innovation through Data-Driven Discoveries in the Electronic Health Record.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of a person's health status that provide a global perspective of patient well-being. PROs can be classified into 4 primary domains: global, mental, physical, and social health. In this descriptive review, we focus on how PROs can be used in cardiac clinical trials, with an emphasis on cardiac surgical trials for patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure. We also highlight ongoing challenges and provide specific suggestions and novel opportunities to advance cardiac clinical trials. Current challenges include the long-term measurement of PROs in clinical trials beyond 1 year, inconsistency in the choice of the outcome measures among studies, and the lack of measurement of PROs across multiple domains. Opportunities for advancement include measuring PROs using consumer health informatics tools, including returning information back to participants in formats that they can understand using visualization. Future opportunities include quantifying cohort-specific minimal clinically important differences for PROs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.