Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974846›Full record

ArticleCell reports2021

Systematic functional analysis of SARS-CoV-2 proteins uncovers viral innate immune antagonists and remaining vulnerabilities.

Manuel Hayn, Maximilian Hirschenberger, Lennart Koepke, Rayhane Nchioua, Jan Hendrik Straub, Susanne Klute, Victoria Hunszinger, Fabian Zech, Caterina Prelli Bozzo, Wasim Aftab and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 168 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
168citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

168 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Anti-interferon armamentarium of human coronaviruses.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review

108 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Manuel HaynInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Maximilian HirschenbergerInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Lennart KoepkeInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Rayhane NchiouaInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Jan Hendrik StraubInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Susanne KluteInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Victoria HunszingerInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Fabian ZechInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Caterina Prelli BozzoInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Wasim AftabBiomedical Center, Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analysis Unit), Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; Graduate School for Quantitative Biosciences (QBM), Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Maria Hønholt ChristensenInstitute of Innate Immunity, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Carina ConzelmannInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Janis Alexander MüllerInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Smitha Srinivasachar BadarinarayanInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; Institute of Medical Virology and Epidemiology of Viral Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Christina Martina StürzelInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Ignasi ForneBiomedical Center, Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analysis Unit), Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Steffen StengerInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Karl-Klaus ConzelmannMax von Pettenkofer-Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Jan MünchInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Florian Ingo SchmidtInstitute of Innate Immunity, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Daniel SauterInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany; Institute of Medical Virology and Epidemiology of Viral Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Axel ImhofBiomedical Center, Zentrallabor für Proteinanalytik (Protein Analysis Unit), Medical Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Frank KirchhoffInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Konstantin Maria Johannes SparrerInstitute of Molecular Virology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: konstantin.sparrer@uni-ulm.de.
Universität Ulm · DECenter for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) evades most innate immune responses but may still be vulnerable to some. Here, we systematically analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2 proteins on interferon (IFN) responses and autophagy. We show that SARS-CoV-2 proteins synergize to counteract anti-viral immune responses. For example, Nsp14 targets the type I IFN receptor for lysosomal degradation, ORF3a prevents fusion of autophagosomes and lysosomes, and ORF7a interferes with autophagosome acidification. Most activities are evolutionarily conserved. However, SARS-CoV-2 Nsp15 antagonizes IFN signaling less efficiently than the orthologs of closely related RaTG13-CoV and SARS-CoV-1. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 proteins counteract autophagy and type I IFN more efficiently than type II or III IFN signaling, and infection experiments confirm potent inhibition by IFN-γ and -λ1. Our results define the repertoire and selected mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 innate immune antagonists but also reveal vulnerability to type II and III IFN that may help to develop safe and effective anti-viral approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsAutophagosomesAutophagyCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19ExoribonucleasesHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansImmune EvasionImmunity, InnateInterferonsInterferon Type IReceptor, Interferon alpha-betaAntiviral AgentsExoribonucleasesInterferonsInterferon Type Insp14 protein, SARS coronavirusReceptor, Interferon alpha-betaViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteinsautophagyCOVID-19cytokineimmune evasioninnate immunityinterferonSARS-CoVSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33974846
PMCPMC8078906
OpenAlexW3157249971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.