Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974816›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2021

Participation of Black Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Challenges and Proposed Solutions.

Muhammad Awidi, Samer Al Hadidi

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad AwidiDepartment of Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.
Samer Al HadidiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4297-8042

Funding

Training In Cell and Gene TherapyT32HL092332 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MALCOLM K. BRENNER, Bruno Di Stefano · 2008 to 2026
$6.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL092332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low participation of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials is a well-established predicament. Many factors resulted in this current dilemma with racism being the fundamental unit. Here, we discuss some current challenges and proposed solutions to help in increasing the enrollment of Black Americans in cancer clinical trials. We suggest implementing the least acceptable race-specific percentage as a new bar that registrational clinical trials need to pass before cancer drugs approval. Clinical trials will continue to draw the future of cancer therapeutics in which we believe that a prompt improvement of Black Americans participation is warranted.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRacismBlack or African AmericanDrug ApprovalHumans

Identifiers

PMID33974816
PMCPMC8258017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.