Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974786›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Interhemispheric Auditory Cortical Synchronization in Asymmetric Hearing Loss.

Jolie L Chang, Ethan D Crawford, Abhishek S Bhutada, Jennifer Henderson Sabes, Jessie Chen, Chang Cai, Corby L Dale, Anne M Findlay, Danielle Mizuiri, Srikantan S Nagarajan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Age-Related Hearing Decline and Resting-State Networks.American journal of audiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jolie L ChangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ethan D CrawfordDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abhishek S BhutadaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jennifer Henderson SabesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jessie ChenDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Chang CaiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Corby L DaleDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anne M FindlayDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Danielle MizuiriDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Srikantan S NagarajanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Steven W CheungDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Engaging University of California Stakeholders for Biorespository ResearchUL1TR000004 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANDIS, JENNIFER RUBIN · 2012 to 2015
$78.0M
Auditory Cortical Processing in Hearing LossR01DC017396 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHREINER, CHRISTOPH E. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000004NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAuditory cortical activation of the two hemispheres to monaurally presented tonal stimuli has been shown to be asynchronous in normal hearing (NH) but synchronous in the extreme case of adult-onset asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) with single-sided deafness. We addressed the wide knowledge gap between these two anchoring states of interhemispheric temporal organization. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to map the trajectory of interhemispheric temporal reorganization from asynchrony to synchrony using magnitude of interaural threshold difference as the independent variable in a cross-sectional study and (2) to evaluate reversibility of interhemispheric synchrony in association with hearing in noise performance by amplifying the aidable poorer ear in a repeated measures, longitudinal study.

designThe cross-sectional and longitudinal cohorts were comprised of 49 subjects (AHL; N = 21; 11 male, 10 female; mean age = 48 years) and NH (N = 28; 16 male, 12 female; mean age = 45 years). The maximum interaural threshold difference of the two cohorts spanned from 0 to 65 dB. Magnetoencephalography analyses focused on latency of the M100 peak response from auditory cortex in both hemispheres between 50 msec and 150 msec following monaural tonal stimulation at the frequency (0.5, 1, 2, 3, or 4 kHz) corresponding to the maximum and minimum interaural threshold difference for better and poorer ears separately. The longitudinal AHL cohort was drawn from three subjects in the cross-sectional AHL cohort (all male; ages 49 to 60 years; varied AHL etiologies; no amplification for at least 2 years). All longitudinal study subjects were treated by monaural amplification of the poorer ear and underwent repeated measures examination of the M100 response latency and quick speech in noise hearing in noise performance at baseline, and postamplification months 3, 6, and 12.

resultsThe M100 response peak latency values in the ipsilateral hemisphere lagged those in the contralateral hemisphere for all stimulation conditions. The mean (SD) interhemispheric latency difference values (ipsilateral less contralateral) to better ear stimulation for three categories of maximum interaural threshold difference were as follows: NH (≤ 10 dB)-8.6 (3.0) msec; AHL (15 to 40 dB)-3.0 (1.2) msec; AHL (≥ 45 dB)-1.4 (1.3) msec. In turn, the magnitude of difference values were used to define interhemispheric temporal organization states of asynchrony, mixed asynchrony and synchrony, and synchrony, respectively. Amplification of the poorer ear in longitudinal subjects drove interhemispheric organization change from baseline synchrony to postamplification asynchrony and hearing in noise performance improvement in those with baseline impairment over a 12-month period.

conclusionsInterhemispheric temporal organization in AHL was anchored between states of asynchrony in NH and synchrony in single-sided deafness. For asymmetry magnitudes between 15 and 40 dB, the intermediate mixed state of asynchrony and synchrony was continuous and reversible. Amplification of the poorer ear in AHL improved hearing in noise performance and restored normal temporal organization of auditory cortices in the two hemispheres. The return to normal interhemispheric asynchrony from baseline synchrony and improvement in hearing following monoaural amplification of the poorer ear evolved progressively over a 12-month period.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexHearing LossAdultAuditory ThresholdCortical SynchronizationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID33974786
PMCPMC8378543
OpenAlexW3142103664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.