Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974662›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

In-cell western assay as a high-throughput approach for Chlamydia trachomatis quantification and susceptibility testing to antimicrobials.

Simone Filardo, Marisa Di Pietro, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Martina Manera, Fabiana Diaco, Rosa Sessa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Simone FilardoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Microbiology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2730-8588
Marisa Di PietroDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Microbiology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Patrizio PasqualettiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Health Statistics and Biometry, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-1979
Martina ManeraDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Microbiology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Fabiana DiacoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Microbiology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Rosa SessaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Section of Microbiology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Department of Public Health · MM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis, the leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases in developed countries, with around 127 million new cases per year, is mainly responsible for urethritis and cervicitis in women, and urethritis and epididymitis in men. Most C. trachomatis infections remain asymptomatic (>50%) and, hence, untreated, leading to severe reproductive complications in both women and men, like infertility. Therefore, the detection of C. trachomatis as well as the antimicrobial susceptibility testing becomes a priority, and, along the years, several methods have been recommended, like cell culture and direct immunofluorescence (DFA) on cell cultures. Herein, we described the application of In-Cell Western assay (ICW) via Odyssey CLx as a fast, more accessible, and high-throughput platform for the quantification of C. trachomatis and the screening of anti-chlamydial drugs. As a first step, we set up a standard curve by infecting cell monolayers with 2-fold serial dilutions of C. trachomatis Elementary Body (EB) suspension. Then, different unknown C. trachomatis EB suspensions were quantified and the chlamydial susceptibility testing to erythromycin was performed, using the DFA as comparison. Our results showed a very high concordance between these two assays, as evidenced by the enumeration of chlamydial IFUs as well as the determination of erythromycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). In conclusion, the ICW assay may be a promising candidate as an accurate and accessible methodology for C. trachomatis antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial LoadBlotting, WesternCell LineChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisErythromycinFeasibility StudiesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycin

Identifiers

PMID33974662
PMCPMC8112659
OpenAlexW3163823859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.