Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974502›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2021

Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users' experiences and care patterns.

Felicia Gabrielsson-Järhult, Sofia Kjellström, Kristina Areskoug Josefsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05211466 (Digital Care Chains in Health Care - a Study of Care Consumption, Care Quality, Work Environment and Well-being), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05211466 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Digital Care Chains in Health Care - a Study of Care Consumption, Care Quality, Work Environment and Well-being

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion GävleborgRan2022 to 2025Enrolled1,012ConditionsStress and Burnout, Work Environment Adverse Effects, Well-Being, Psychological, Care Givers SatisfactionArmsDigital healthcare platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pandemic COVID-19 as a challenge for telemedicine in the Czech Republic.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Felicia Gabrielsson-JärhultSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Sofia KjellströmSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Kristina Areskoug JosefssonSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Jönköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to explore users' experiences and care patterns concerning telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care from 2017 to 2019.

resultsUsers mainly described telemedicine consultations as a positive experience and perceived that the service met their current health care needs. Users also valued high accessibility, timesaving, and the contribution to ecological sustainability. Users felt competent about choosing when to use telemedicine consultations, most commonly for less severe health care concerns. This was confirmed by the quantitative results; only a few users had other care contacts within physical primary care before, or after, the telemedicine consultation, attended acute care or phoned 1177 Health Care Guidance.

conclusionsThis study provides a rare account of users' experiences of telemedicine consultations. Users expressed satisfaction with this up-to-date use of health care resources for them as individuals, the health care system, and the environment. Telemedicine consultations were perceived as efficient and safe according to users. In addition, the study shows a low degree of further physical contacts in primary care or in acute care related to the telemedicine consultations.Key pointsUsers have positive experiences of telemedicine consultations with physicians and experienced that the service had meet their actual needs for health care.Users were mainly satisfied with the service and highlighted the value of high accessibility.Users experienced that telemedicine consultants provided an alternative care service for mostly minor health problems, perceiving them to save time and resources for themselves, the health care system, and the environment.Most telemedicine consultations did not result in additional contacts with 1177 Health Care Guidance, physical visits to primary care, or acute health care.Telemedicine consultations with physicians were mainly used by persons aged 0-30 years and need to be further developed to suit other age groups.

Indexed as

PhysiciansTelemedicineHumansPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSwedencare patternse-healthmixed methodspatient experiencespatient satisfactionPrimary health careSwedentelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33974502
PMCPMC8293950
OpenAlexW3160757362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.