Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974347›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2021

The importance of collaboratively designing pharmacology education programs.

Kelly M Quesnelle, Naunihal T Zaveri, Stephen D Schneid, Joe B Blumer, John L Szarek, Marieke Kruidering, Michael W Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelly M QuesnelleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2408-1904
Naunihal T ZaveriDepartment of Microbiology and Pharmacology, Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Smith, AR, USA.
Stephen D SchneidSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Joe B BlumerDepartment of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0020-3815
John L SzarekDepartment of Medical Education, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA.
Marieke KruideringDepartment of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael W LeeDepartment of Medical Education, Department of Oncology, and Associate Member Live Strong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-2057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A grounded knowledge of pharmacology is essential for healthcare providers to improve the quality of patients' lives, avoid medical errors, and circumvent potentially dangerous drug-drug interactions. One of the greatest tools to achieve this foundational knowledge of pharmacology is the dedicated pharmacology educators who teach in health sciences programs. Too often, the pharmacology educators responsible for teaching this material are left siloed at their own institutions with little room for dialog and collaboration. As scientists, we know that it is through dialog and collaboration that ideas grow, are refined, and improve. More collaborative work is needed to identify and describe best practices for pharmacology education in health sciences programs. While evidence-based, outcomes-focused studies are the optimum standard for this work, there is also a place for descriptive studies and innovative reports.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary PlacementCurriculumHealth PersonnelHumansPharmacology, Clinical

Identifiers

PMID33974347
PMCPMC8112302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.