ArticleThe AAPS journal2021
Structure-Based SAR in the Design of Selective or Bifunctional Nociceptin (NOP) Receptor Agonists.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural factors for receptor binding and activation of the Nociceptin opioid receptor by full and partial agonists.Biochemical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Discovery and structure-activity relationships (SAR) of a novel class of 2-substituted N-piperidinyl indole-based nociceptin opioid receptor ligands.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Attenuated G protein signaling and minimal receptor phosphorylation as a biochemical signature of low side-effect opioid analgesics.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The nociceptin opioid receptor (NOP), the fourth member of the opioid receptor family, and its endogenous peptide ligand, nociceptin or orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), play a vital role in several central nervous system pathways regulating pain, reward, feeding, anxiety, motor control and learning/memory. Both selective NOP agonists as well as bifunctional agonists at the NOP and mu opioid receptor (MOP) have potential therapeutic applications in CNS disorders related to these processes. Using Surflex-Dock protocols, we conducted a computational structure-activity study of four scaffold classes of NOP ligands with varying NOP-MOP selectivity. By docking these compounds into the orthosteric binding sites within an active-state NOP homology model, and an active-state MOP crystal structure, the goal of this study was to use a structure-based drug design approach to modulate NOP affinity and NOP vs. MOP selectivity. We first docked four parent compounds (no side chain) to determine their binding interactions within the NOP and MOP binding pockets. Various polar sidechains were added to the heterocyclic A-pharmacophore to modulate NOP ligand affinity. The substitutions mainly contained a 1-2 carbon chain with a polar substituent such as an amine, alcohol, sulfamide, or guanidine. The SAR analysis is focused on the impact of structural changes in the sidechain, such as chain length, hydrogen bonding capability, and basic vs neutral functional groups on binding affinity and selectivity at both NOP and MOP receptors. This study highlights structural modifications that can be leveraged to rationally design both selective NOP and bifunctional NOP-MOP agonists with different ratios of functional efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.