Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974126›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Physiological responses to maximal 4 s sprint interval cycling using inertial loading: the influence of inter-sprint recovery duration.

Emre Vardarli, Remzi Satiroglu, Jacob R Allen, Ryan Bjellquist-Ledger, Heath M Burton, Edward F Coyle

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04448925 (Physiological Responses to Maximal 4-s Sprint Interval Cycling Using Inertial Loading), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04448925 nacompletednot on this map

Physiological Responses to Maximal 4-s Sprint Interval Cycling Using Inertial Loading: the Influence of Inter-sprint Recovery Duration

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2019 to 2020Enrolled16ConditionsExercise, Cardiovascular Function, Fatigue, Muscular PowerArmsinertial-load exercise (ILE)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emre VardarliDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Remzi SatirogluDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Jacob R AllenDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Ryan Bjellquist-LedgerDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Heath M BurtonDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Edward F CoyleDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Education, Human Performance Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin, One University Station, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. coyle@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-8287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterval exercise allows very high-power outputs to be maintained, a key for stimulating training adaptations. The main purpose of this study was to develop a sprint interval protocol that stimulated both anaerobic and aerobic systems while maximizing power output and minimizing fatigue. The secondary goal was to investigate the influence of inter-sprint recovery duration.

methodsSixteen (8 females) participants (age: 23.5 ± 3.4 years, peak oxygen consumption (VO

resultsPeak power output (PPO) was maintained while taking 45 and 30 s of recovery, although it was 9% higher (p < 0.05) during 45 vs. 30 s. PPO with 15 s recovery declined 18% (p < 0.05) and then stabilized as did oxygen consumption (72±2% VO

conclusionThe present study describes the use of an inertial-load ergometer to accommodate repeated 4 s maximal cycling sprints that elicit 72% VO TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: NCT04448925, 26 Jun 2020; retrospectively registered to clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

AccelerationAdaptation, PhysiologicalBicyclingCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansLactatesMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionPulmonary Gas ExchangeYoung AdultLactatesAerobic exerciseAnaerobic exerciseExercise performanceInertial load ergometerMaximal cycling power

Identifiers

PMID33974126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.