Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33974055›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Mortality and Morbidity of Infants Born Extremely Preterm at Tertiary Medical Centers in China From 2010 to 2019.

Zhicheng Zhu, Lin Yuan, Jin Wang, Qiuping Li, Chuanzhong Yang, Xirong Gao, Shangqin Chen, Shuping Han, Jiangqin Liu, Hui Wu and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Risk factors associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2-3 years of corrected age in extremely preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Zhicheng ZhuDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Lin YuanDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiuping LiDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Bayi Children's Hospital, Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuanzhong YangDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Xirong GaoDepartment of Neonatology, Hunan Children's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Shangqin ChenDepartment of Neonatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Shuping HanDepartment of Neonatology, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangqin LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hui WuDepartment of Neonatology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shaojie YueDepartment of Neonatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jingyun ShiDepartment of Neonatology, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Rui ChengDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiuyong ChengDepartment of Neonatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Tongyan HanDepartment of Neonatology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong JiangDepartment of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Lei BaoDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Extreme prematurity is associated with a substantial burden on health care systems worldwide. However, little is known about the prognosis of infants born extremely preterm in developing countries, such as China. Objective: To describe survival and major morbidity among infants born extremely preterm in China over the past decade. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2019. Included individuals were infants with gestational age less than 28 weeks discharged from 1 of 68 neonatal intensive care units located in 31 provinces in China. Data were analyzed from August through October 2020. Exposure: Extremely preterm birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival to discharge and major morbidity (ie, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, grades III-IV intraventricular hemorrhage, white matter injury, stage II-III necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or severe retinopathy of prematurity) were measured. Results: Among 8514 eligible infants, 5295 (62.2%) were male and 116 infants (2.0%) were small for gestational age (SGA). Overall, 5302 infants (62.3%) survived to discharge. The survival rate was 1 of 21 infants (4.8%) at 22 weeks, 13 of 71 infants (18.3%) at 23 weeks, 144 of 408 infants (35.3%) at 24 weeks, 480 of 987 infants (48.6%) at 25 weeks, 1423 of 2331 infants (61.0%) at 26 weeks, and 3241 of 4692 infants (69.1%) at 27 weeks. Survival increased from 136 of 241 infants (56.4%; 95% CI, 50.1%-62.7%) in 2010 to 1110 of 1633 infants (68.0%; 95% CI, 65.7%-70.2%) in 2019 for infants born at 24 to 27 weeks (mean difference, 11.5%; 95% CI, 4.9%-18.2%; P < .001), without a significant change for infants born at less than 24 weeks. Major morbidity was found in 5999 of 8281 infants overall, for a rate of 72.4%, which increased from 116 of 223 infants (52.0%; 95% CI, 45.4%-58.6%) to 1363 of 1656 infants (82.3%; 95% CI, 80.5%-84.1%) from 2010 to 2019 (mean difference, 30.3%; 95% CI, 23.5%-37.1%, P < .001). Regional variations in survival were identified, with an almost 2-fold increase (1.94-fold; 95% CI, 1.66-2.27; P < .001) from 188 of 474 infants (39.7%) in northwest China to 887 of 1153 infants (76.9%) in north China. Gestational age (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.084; 95% CI, 1.063-1.105; P < .001), birth weight (aRR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.020-1.036; P < .001), premature rupture of membranes (aRR, 1.025; 95% CI, 1.002-1.048; P = .03), and antenatal steroids (aRR, 1.029; 95% CI, 1.004-1.055; P = .02) were associated with improved survival, while being born SGA (aRR, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.679-0.945; P = .01), being male (aRR, 0.975; 95% CI, 0.954-0.997; P = .02), multiple birth (aRR, 0.955; 95% CI, 0.929-0.982; P = .001), having a mother with gestational diabetes (aRR, 0.946; 95% CI, 0.913-0.981; P = .002), and low Apgar score (aRR, 0.951; 95% CI, 0.925-0.977; P < .001) were found to be risk factors associated with decreased chances of survival. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that infants born extremely preterm were at increased risk of mortality and morbidity in China, with a survival rate that improved over time and a major morbidity rate that increased. These findings suggest that more active and effective treatment strategies are needed, especially for infants born at gestational age 25 to 27 weeks.

Indexed as

Infant, Extremely PrematureAdolescentAdultChinaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleMaternal AgeRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTertiary Care CentersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33974055
PMCPMC8114138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.