Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973867›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2021

Adapting a Person's Home in 3D Using a Mobile App (MapIt): Participatory Design Framework Investigating the App's Acceptability.

Manon Guay, Mathieu Labbé, Noémie Séguin-Tremblay, Claudine Auger, Geneviève Goyer, Emily Veloza, Natalie Chevalier, Jan Polgar, François Michaud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of Virtual Reality Technology to Support the Home Modification Process: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Manon GuaySchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-9327
Mathieu LabbéInterdisciplinary Institute for Technological Innovation, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-5595
Noémie Séguin-TremblayResearch Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7963-2593
Claudine AugerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-2004
Geneviève GoyerResearch Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-441X
Emily VelozaResearch Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-8145
Natalie ChevalierResearch Center on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7957-6381
Jan PolgarSchool of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-304X
François MichaudInterdisciplinary Institute for Technological Innovation, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-7770
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CACentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome adaptation processes enhancing occupational engagement rely on identifying environmental barriers, generally during time-consuming home visits performed by occupational therapists (OTs). Relevance of a 3D model to the OT's work has been attested, but a convenient and consumer-available technology to map the home environment in 3D is currently lacking. For instance, such a technology would support the exploration of home adaptations for a person with disability, with or without an OT visit.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to document the development and acceptability of a 3D mapping eHealth technology, optimizing its contribution to the OT's work when conducting assessments in which home representations are essential to fit a person's needs.

methodsA user-centered perspective, embedded in a participatory design framework where users are considered as research partners (not as just study participants), is reported. OTs, engineers, clinicians, researchers, and students, as well as the relatives of older adults contributed by providing ongoing feedback (eg, demonstrations, brainstorming, usability testing, questionnaires, prototyping). System acceptability, as per the Nielsen model, is documented by deductively integrating the data.

resultsA total of 24 stakeholders contributed significantly to MapIt technology's co-design over a span of 4 years. Fueled by the objective to enhance MapIt's acceptability, 11 iterations lead to a mobile app to scan a room and produce its 3D model in less than 5 minutes. The app is available for smartphones and paired with computer software. Scanning, visualization, and automatic measurements are done on a smartphone equipped with a motion sensor and a camera with depth perception, and the computer software facilitates visualization, while allowing custom measurement of architectural elements directly on the 3D model. Stakeholders' perception was favorable regarding MapIt's acceptability, testifying to its usefulness (ie, usability and utility). Residual usability issues as well as concerns about accessibility and scan rendering still need to be addressed to foster its integration to a clinical context.

conclusionsMapIt allows to scan a room quickly and simply, providing a 3D model from images taken in real-world settings and to remotely but jointly explore home adaptations to enhance a person's occupational engagement.

Indexed as

3D visualizationagingassistive technologybuilt environmentcameradisabilitymobile phoneoccupational therapyremote assessmenttelehealthuniversal design

Identifiers

PMID33973867
PMCPMC8150410
OpenAlexW3151458195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.