Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973681›Full record

ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2022

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression: Comparing Commonly Used Clinical Protocols.

Noah S Philip, Ryan A Doherty, Christiana Faucher, Emily Aiken, Mascha van 't Wout-Frank

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noah S PhilipVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4889-8775
Ryan A DohertyVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Christiana FaucherVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Emily AikenVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Mascha van 't Wout-FrankVA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Healthcare System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-1989
Brown University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging and Neuromodulation CoreP20GM130452 · NIGMS · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI GREENBERG, BENJAMIN D · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
Mechanistic circuit markers of transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes in pharmacoresistant depressionR01MH120126 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, LEANNE · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Brief Cognitive Therapy to Reduce Veteran SuicideI01HX002572 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PHILIP, NOAH STEPHEN, PRIMACK, JENNIFER MARIE · 2019 to 2024
–
Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality for PTSDI01RX002450 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PHILIP, NOAH STEPHEN · 2018 to 2022
–
VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and NeurotechnologyI50RX002864 · VA · PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENJAMIN D GREENBERG, LEIGH R HOCHBERG · 2018 to 2026
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002572NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130452NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120126RRD VA I01 RX002450RRD VA I50 RX002864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is increasingly being used to treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) comorbid with major depressive disorder (MDD). Yet, identifying the most effective stimulation parameters remains an active area of research. We recently reported on the use of 5 Hz TMS to reduce PTSD and MDD symptoms. A recently developed form of TMS, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), appears noninferior for treating MDD. Because iTBS can be delivered in a fraction of the time, it provides significant logistical advantages; however, evaluations of whether iTBS provides comparable PTSD and MDD symptom reductions are lacking. We performed a retrospective chart review comparing clinical outcomes in veterans with PTSD and MDD who received iTBS (n = 10) with a matched cohort that received 5-Hz TMS (n = 10). Symptoms were evaluated using self-reported rating scales at baseline and every five treatments for up to 30 sessions. Both protocols were safe and reduced symptoms, ps < .001, but veterans who received iTBS reported poorer outcomes. These results were observed using mixed-model analyses, Group x Time interaction: p = .011, and effect sizes, where 5 Hz TMS demonstrated superior PTSD and MDD symptom improvement, ds = 1.81 and 1.51, respectively, versus iTBS, ds = 0.63 and 0.88, respectively. Data from prior controlled trials of iTBS, with increased stimulation exposure, have appeared to provide comparable clinical outcomes compared with 5 Hz TMS. Prospective and controlled comparisons are required; however, the present findings provide important information for clinicians using TMS to treat these commonly comorbid disorders.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticClinical ProtocolsDepressionHumansPrefrontal CortexProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33973681
PMCPMC8581062
OpenAlexW3163199921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.