Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973656›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2021

Monitoring COVID-19 contagion growth.

Arianna Agosto, Alexandra Campmas, Paolo Giudici, Andrea Renda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A New Interactive Tool to Visualize and Analyze COVID-19 Data: The PERISCOPE Atlas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Estimating COVID-19-induced excess mortality in Lombardy, Italy.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A log linear Poisson autoregressive model to understand COVID-19 dynamics in Saudi Arabia.Beni-Suef University journal of basic and applied sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Monitoring COVID-19 contagion growth.Statistics in medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arianna AgostoUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Alexandra CampmasUniversity of Bordeaux - LAREFI, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9108-1034
Paolo GiudiciUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Andrea RendaCEPS, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme N°101016233 - H2020-SC1-PHE_CORONAVIRUS-2020-2-RT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a statistical model that can be employed to monitor the time evolution of the COVID-19 contagion curve and the associated reproduction rate. The model is a Poisson autoregression of the daily new observed cases and dynamically adapt its estimates to explain the evolution of contagion in terms of a short-term and long-term dependence of case counts, allowing for a comparative evaluation of health policy measures. We have applied the model to 2020 data from the countries most hit by the virus. Our empirical findings show that the proposed model describes the evolution of contagion dynamics and determines whether contagion growth can be affected by health policies. Based on our findings, we can draw two health policy conclusions that can be useful for all countries in the world. First, policy measures aimed at reducing contagion are very useful when contagion is at its peak to reduce the reproduction rate. Second, the contagion curve should be accurately monitored over time to apply policy measures that are cost-effective.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PolicyHumansModels, StatisticalSARS-CoV-2contagion modelsCOVID-19Poisson autoregressive modelsreproduction number

Identifiers

PMID33973656
PMCPMC8242489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.