Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973645›Full record

ArticleHistology and histopathology2021

Osseointegration of a novel 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V implant material - Histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.

Stephan Frosch, Gottfried Buchhorn, Sebastian Krohn, Wolfgang Lehmann, Karl-Heinz Frosch, László Füzesi, Alice Frosch

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histology and histopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephan FroschDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. Stephan.Frosch@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Gottfried BuchhornDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Sebastian KrohnDepartment of Prosthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Wolfgang LehmannDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Karl-Heinz FroschDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg - Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
László FüzesiDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Alice FroschDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

Federal Ministry for Science and Technology of Germany BMWT - ZIM - KA 2002 23 02 MD 8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porous structure properties are known to conduct initial and long-term stability of titanium alloy implants. This study aims to assess the histomorphometric effect of a 3-D porosity in Ti-6Al-4V implants (PI) on osseointegration in comparison to solid Ti-6Al-4V implants (SI). The PI was produced in a spaceholder method and sintering and has a pore size of mean 400 µm (50 µm to 500 µm) and mimics human trabecular bone. Pairs of PI and equal sized SI as reference were bilaterally implanted at random in the lateral femoral condyle of 16 Chinchilla-Bastard rabbits. The animals were sacrificed after 4 and 12 weeks for histomorphometric analysis. The histomorphometric evaluation confirmed a successful short-term osseohealing (4 weeks) and mid-term osseoremodeling (12 weeks) for both types of implants. The total newly formed bone area was larger for PI than for SI after 4 and 12 weeks, with the intraporous bone area being accountable for the significant difference (p<0.05). A more detailed observation of bone area distribution revealed a bony accumulation in a radius of +/- 500 µm around the implant surface after remodeling. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) increased significantly (p<0.05) from 4 to 12 weeks (PI 26.23 % to 42.68 %; SI 28.44 % to 47.47 %) for both types of implants. Due to different surface properties, however, PI had a significant (p<0.05) larger absolute osseous contact (mm) to the implant circumference compared to the SI (4 weeks: 7.46 mm vs 5.72 mm; 12 weeks: 11.57 mm vs 9.52 mm [PI vs. SI]). The regional influences (trabecular vs. cortical) on bone formation and the intraporous distribution were also presented. Conclusively, the porous structure and surface properties of PI enable a successful and regular osseointegration and enhance the bony fixation compared to solid implants under experimental conditions.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAlloysAnimalsBone RemodelingCancellous BoneFemurMaterials TestingOsseointegrationPorosityRabbitsTitaniumAlloysTitaniumtitanium alloy (TiAl6V4)

Identifiers

PMID33973645
OpenAlexW3163719041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.