Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973539›Full record

ReviewMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2021

Evaluation of systemic estrogen for preventing urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women.

Kate A Fox, Erica M Lokken, Susan D Reed, David D Rahn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kate A FoxMedical School, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Erica M LokkenDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Susan D ReedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
David D RahnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX.

Funding

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network 2021UG1HD054241 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI David Dwight Rahn · 2016 to 2026
$3.0M
Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence Of the Vagina using Estrogen (IMPROVE)R01AG047290 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAHN, DAVID DWIGHT · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047290NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD054241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceCurrent guidelines for postmenopausal recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) prevention recommend the use of vaginal topical estrogen products but not systemic estrogens. Studies show that vaginal estrogen decreases the risk of rUTI, but evidence against use of systemic estrogen is less convincing.

objectiveWe performed a comprehensive literature review to evaluate the effect of systemic estrogen on UTI occurrence among postmenopausal women. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for manuscripts published in English between January 1990 and July 2020. The search terms were "urinary tract infection" and "estrogen." Inclusion criteria were studies of postmenopausal women who received systemic estrogen therapy (any regimen) that reported UTI frequency during any follow-up period. Case studies, commentaries, and reviews were excluded. A priori specifications of seven study criteria were set representing the ideal study for assessing efficacy of systemic estrogen for rUTI prevention and were used to evaluate each included study.

findingsSearches identified 281 results, and after deduplication and review, 8 studies met inclusion criteria: 4 randomized controlled trials, 1 secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 1 prospective cohort study, 1 case-control study, and 1 cross-sectional study. Of the eight included studies, only two enrolled postmenopausal women with a rUTI diagnosis, four had sufficient sample size to detect a clinically meaningful difference between systemic estrogen versus placebo, two used dosage regimens anticipated to achieve a therapeutic effect, and three assessed UTI rates for an adequate duration of 6 months or more (the standard minimum duration of time needed to make a diagnosis of rUTI). Overall, none of the studies met all predefined criteria for the ideal study to assess the efficacy of systemic estrogen for rUTI prevention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: UTIs will continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and hospitalizations in postmenopausal women unless more research is done to better understand the role of estrogen on UTI rates. The evidence arguing use (or abandonment) of systemic estrogen for the prevention of rUTI is based on few studies with substantial methodologic limitations; there is significant room for improvement.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseUrinary Tract InfectionsCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEstrogensFemaleHumansProspective StudiesEstrogens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.