Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973521›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

In vitro reconstitution reveals major differences between human and bacterial cytochrome c synthases.

Molly C Sutherland, Deanna L Mendez, Shalon E Babbitt, Dustin E Tillman, Olga Melnikov, Nathan L Tran, Noah T Prizant, Andrea L Collier, Robert G Kranz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heme handling in the system II heme lyase CcsBA from Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Biogenesis of CytochromesACS infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Recent advances in microbial synthesis of free heme.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Biogenesis of cytochromesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly C Sutherland *Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-5339
Deanna L Mendez *Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Shalon E Babbitt *Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Dustin E TillmanDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7450-0927
Olga MelnikovDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Nathan L TranDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-3945
Noah T PrizantDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Andrea L CollierDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.
Robert G KranzDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4309-9413
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSES OF CYTOCHROMES C BIOGENESISR01GM047909 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KRANZ, ROBERT G. · 1994 to 2019
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytochromes c are ubiquitous heme proteins in mitochondria and bacteria, all possessing a CXXCH (CysXxxXxxCysHis) motif with covalently attached heme. We describe the first in vitro reconstitution of cytochrome c biogenesis using purified mitochondrial (HCCS) and bacterial (CcsBA) cytochrome c synthases. We employ apocytochrome c and peptide analogs containing CXXCH as substrates, examining recognition determinants, thioether attachment, and subsequent release and folding of cytochrome c. Peptide analogs reveal very different recognition requirements between HCCS and CcsBA. For HCCS, a minimal 16-mer peptide is required, comprised of CXXCH and adjacent alpha helix 1, yet neither thiol is critical for recognition. For bacterial CcsBA, both thiols and histidine are required, but not alpha helix 1. Heme attached peptide analogs are not released from the HCCS active site; thus, folding is important in the release mechanism. Peptide analogs behave as inhibitors of cytochrome c biogenesis, paving the way for targeted control.

Indexed as

BacteriaCatalytic DomainCytochromes cEscherichia coliHemeHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLyasesMitochondriaPeptidesSubstrate Specificitycytochrome C synthetaseCytochromes cHemeLyasesPeptidesbiochemistrychemical biologycytochrome ccytochrome c biogenesisHemeheme attachmentpost translational modificationsynthases

Identifiers

PMID33973521
PMCPMC8112865
OpenAlexW3157272073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.