Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33973294›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2021

Front-line nurses' responses to organisational changes during the COVID-19 in Spain: A qualitative rapid appraisal.

Glòria Tort-Nasarre, Bruna Alvarez, Paola Galbany-Estragués, Martí Subías-Miquel, Eva Vázquez-Segura, Diana Marre, Maria Romeu-Labayen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role conflict, job crafting, stress and resilience among nurses during COVID-19.Journal of contingencies and crisis management · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Glòria Tort-NasarreHealth Education Research Group (GREpS), Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5270-821X
Bruna AlvarezAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-4573
Paola Galbany-EstraguésAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3775-1695
Martí Subías-MiquelAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8853-0468
Eva Vázquez-SeguraAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7832-4721
Diana MarreAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2852-3762
Maria Romeu-LabayenAFIN Research Group and Outreach Centre, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9482-9474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo identify the organisational changes faced by front-line nurses working with COVID-19 patients during the first wave and describe how they responded to these changes.

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has altered the provision of care and the management of health care around the world. Evolving information about SARS-CoV-2 meant that health care facilities had to be reorganised continually, causing stress and anxiety for nurses.

methodsQualitative study based on Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal (RREAL). The research took place in hospital and community health settings of the Spanish national health system with a purposive sampling of 23 front-line nurses. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between May and June 2020. The duration was 30-45 min per interview. We used the Dedoose® data analysis software to perform a thematic analysis.

resultsNurses responded to organisational changes using the following strategies: improvisation, adaptation and learning.

conclusionOur rapid approach allowed us to record how nurses responded to changing organisation, information that is easily lost in a disaster such as the COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Knowing about their strategies can help planning for future health disasters, including subsequent waves of the COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesHumansOrganizational InnovationPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SpainCOVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019)health care facilitiesnursingorganisation and administrationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33973294
PMCPMC8236967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.