Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972834›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Evaluating the influence of action- and subject-specific factors on chimpanzee action copying.

Alba Motes-Rodrigo, Roger Mundry, Josep Call, Claudio Tennie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alba Motes-RodrigoDepartment of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4444-7723
Roger MundryMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Josep CallSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Claudio TennieDepartment of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5302-4925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to imitate has been deemed crucial for the emergence of human culture. Although non-human animals also possess culture, the acquisition mechanisms underlying behavioural variation between populations in other species is still under debate. It is especially controversial whether great apes can spontaneously imitate. Action- and subject-specific factors have been suggested to influence the likelihood of an action to be imitated. However, few studies have jointly tested these hypotheses. Just one study to date has reported spontaneous imitation in chimpanzees (Persson

Indexed as

action copyinganchored actionschimpanzeesenvironmental effectsnoveltyrearing background

Identifiers

PMID33972834
PMCPMC8074636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.