Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972817›Full record

ArticleKnowledge-based systems2021

TClustVID: A novel machine learning classification model to investigate topics and sentiment in COVID-19 tweets.

Md Shahriare Satu, Md Imran Khan, Mufti Mahmud, Shahadat Uddin, Matthew A Summers, Julian M W Quinn, Mohammad Ali Moni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knowledge-based systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
30.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. When Infodemic Meets Epidemic: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Md Shahriare SatuDepartment of Management Information Systems, Noakhali Science & Technology University, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh.
Md Imran KhanDepartment of Computer Scienc & Engineering, Gono Bishwabidyalay, Savar, Dhaka, 1344, Bangladesh.
Mufti MahmudDepartment of Computer Science, and Medical Technology Innovation Facility, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Clifton, Nottingham - NG11 8NS, UK.
Shahadat UddinComplex Systems Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW 2008, Australia.
Matthew A SummersThe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Healthy Ageing Theme, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Julian M W QuinnThe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Healthy Ageing Theme, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Mohammad Ali MoniThe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Healthy Ageing Theme, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Garvan Institute of Medical Research · AUGono University · BDNoakhali Science and Technology University · BDNottingham Trent University · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV2 infection, varies greatly in its severity but presents with serious respiratory symptoms with vascular and other complications, particularly in older adults. The disease can be spread by both symptomatic and asymptomatic infected individuals. Uncertainty remains over key aspects of the virus infectiousness (particularly the newly emerging variants) and the disease has had severe economic impacts globally. For these reasons, COVID-19 is the subject of intense and widespread discussion on social media platforms including Facebook and Twitter. These public forums substantially influence public opinions and in some cases can exacerbate the widespread panic and misinformation spread during the crisis. Thus, this work aimed to design an intelligent clustering-based classification and topic extracting model named TClustVID that analyzes COVID-19-related public tweets to extract significant sentiments with high accuracy. We gathered COVID-19 Twitter datasets from the IEEE Dataport repository and employed a range of data preprocessing methods to clean the raw data, then applied tokenization and produced a word-to-index dictionary. Thereafter, different classifications were employed on these datasets which enabled the exploration of the performance of traditional classification and TClustVID. Our analysis found that TClustVID showed higher performance compared to traditional methodologies that are determined by clustering criteria. Finally, we extracted significant topics from the clusters, split them into positive, neutral and negative sentiments, and identified the most frequent topics using the proposed model. This approach is able to rapidly identify commonly prevailing aspects of public opinions and attitudes related to COVID-19 and infection prevention strategies spreading among different populations.

Indexed as

ClassificationCOVID-19Machine learningTClustVIDTopics modelingTwitter data

Identifiers

PMID33972817
PMCPMC8099549
OpenAlexW3159597990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.