ArticleBiogeochemistry2021
Characterizing bioavailable phosphorus concentrations in an agricultural stream during hydrologic and streambed disturbances.
Article in Biogeochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal Algae and Nutrient Removal by Polyaluminum Chloride and Chitosan in a Drinking Water Reservoir.Polymers · 2026Article
- Sustainable phosphorus recovery and starch-protein-rich biomass generation from wastewater via duckweed.iScience · 2026Article
- Inferences based on diatom compositions improve estimates of nutrient concentrations in streams.The Science of the total environment · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In freshwater ecosystems, phosphorus (P) is often considered a growth-limiting nutrient. The use of fertilizers on agricultural fields has led to runoff-driven increases in P availability in streams, and the subsequent eutrophication of downstream ecosystems. Isolated storms and periodic streambed dredging are examples of two common disturbances that contribute dissolved and particulate P to agricultural streams, which can be quantified as soluble reactive P (SRP) using the molybdate-blue method on filtered water samples, or total P (TP) measured using digestions on unfiltered water reflecting all forms of P. While SRP is often considered an approximation of bioavailable P (BAP), research has shown that this is not always the case. Current methods used to estimate BAP do not account for the role of biology (e.g., NaOH extractions) or require specialized platforms (e.g., algal bioassays). Here, in addition to routine analysis of SRP and TP, we used a novel yeast-based bioassay with unfiltered sample water to estimate BAP concentrations during two storms (top 80% and > 95% flow quantiles), and downstream of a reach where management-associated dredging disturbed the streambed. We found that the BAP concentrations were often greater than SRP, suggesting that SRP is not fully representative of P bioavailability. The SRP concentrations were similarly elevated during the two storms, but remained consistently low during streambed disturbance. In contrast, turbidity and TP were elevated during all events. The BAP concentrations were significantly related to turbidity during all disturbance events, but with TP only during storms. The novel yeast assay suggests that BAP export can exceed SRP, particularly when streams are not in equilibrium, such as the rising limb of storms or during active dredging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.