Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972771›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2021

Navigating CAR-T cells through the solid-tumour microenvironment.

Andrew J Hou, Laurence C Chen, Yvonne Y Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 341 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
341citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

341 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Low-dose docetaxel reprograms CAR T cells for enhanced solid tumor immunity.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

281 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew J HouDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-2385
Laurence C ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Yvonne Y ChenDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. yvonne.chen@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5583-119X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoptive transfer of T cells that are engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown remarkable success in treating B cell malignancies but only limited efficacy against other cancer types, especially solid tumours. Compared with haematological diseases, solid tumours present a unique set of challenges, including a lack of robustly expressed, tumour-exclusive antigen targets as well as highly immunosuppressive and metabolically challenging tumour microenvironments that limit treatment safety and efficacy. Here, we review protein- and cell-engineering strategies that seek to overcome these obstacles and produce next-generation T cells with enhanced tumour specificity and sustained effector function for the treatment of solid malignancies.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveAnimalsHumansProtein EngineeringReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.