Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972712›Full record

ArticleNature plants2021

Plant scientists' research attention is skewed towards colourful, conspicuous and broadly distributed flowers.

Martino Adamo, Matteo Chialva, Jacopo Calevo, Filippo Bertoni, Kingsley Dixon, Stefano Mammola

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. The link between colorfulness and extinction risk across the world's passerine birds.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Leveraging local species data, a global database, and an occupancy model to explore bee-plant interactions.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pretty privilege.Nature plants · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biases in parasite biodiversity research: why some helminth species attract more research than others.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A critical analysis of plant science literature reveals ongoing inequities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martino AdamoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. martino.adamo@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7571-3505
Matteo ChialvaDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-6642
Jacopo CalevoDepartment of Biology, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1717-2365
Filippo BertoniHumanities of Nature, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany.
Kingsley DixonSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
Stefano MammolaMolecular Ecology Group, Water Research Institute (IRSA), National Research Council (CNR), Verbania Pallanza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientists' research interests are often skewed toward charismatic organisms, but quantifying research biases is challenging. By combining bibliometric data with trait-based approaches and using a well-studied alpine flora as a case study, we demonstrate that morphological and colour traits, as well as range size, have significantly more impact on species choice for wild flowering plants than traits related to ecology and rarity. These biases should be taken into account to inform more objective plant conservation efforts.

Indexed as

BotanyFlowersResearch PersonnelBibliometricsColorHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.