ArticleSpinal cord2021
Spinal cord injury and work challenges: an analysis of paid work status and pathways of return to work in Brazil.
Article in Spinal cord, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors affecting return to work after spinal cord injury in Japan: a cross-sectional study.Spinal cord · 2025Article
- Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries - a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
designRetrospective cohort study.
objectivesTo investigate paid work status and return to work (RTW) pathways after spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingSARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals.
methodsParticipants were adults with traumatic SCI, aged between 18 and 60 years at the time of the injury, admitted between 2000 and 2017. In the first stage, socio-demographic, injury-related, and functional status data were collected from medical records. In the second stage, data on paid work, means of mobility, driving ability, return to study, ability to work, and satisfaction with the work status were collected through an online survey conducted between January and March 2020.
resultsA total of 154 participants were included in the sample. Of these, 90% were working at the time of SCI and 23% were engaged in paid work at the time of the study. Three RTW pathways were identified among those who were working at the time of the injury and: did not return to work (78%); returned to a different occupation (12%) and returned to the same occupation (9%). Number of post-injury complications, returning to study, good work ability, and satisfaction with the work status were predictors of paid work. The model's adjusted coefficient was 56.5% (p = 0.001).
conclusionWorking-age people with SCI who underwent rehabilitation in Brazil had a low rate of paid work. Fewer complications at the time of the injury, returning to study, good ability to work and greater satisfaction with the work status increased the likelihood of being engaged in paid work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33972700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.