Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972654›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

A synthetic RNA editing factor edits its target site in chloroplasts and bacteria.

Santana Royan, Bernard Gutmann, Catherine Colas des Francs-Small, Suvi Honkanen, Jason Schmidberger, Ashley Soet, Yueming Kelly Sun, Lilian Vincis Pereira Sanglard, Charles S Bond, Ian Small

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Emerging clinical applications of ADAR based RNA editing.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Santana RoyanSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Bernard GutmannAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Catherine Colas des Francs-SmallAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-5672
Suvi HonkanenAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-3365
Jason SchmidbergerSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Ashley SoetSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Yueming Kelly SunAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Lilian Vincis Pereira SanglardAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Charles S BondSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Ian SmallAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia. ian.small@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5300-1216
Australian Research Council · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family act as specificity factors in C-to-U RNA editing. The expansion of the PPR superfamily in plants provides the sequence variation required for design of consensus-based RNA-binding proteins. We used this approach to design a synthetic RNA editing factor to target one of the sites in the Arabidopsis chloroplast transcriptome recognised by the natural editing factor CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19). We show that our synthetic editing factor specifically recognises the target sequence in in vitro binding assays. The designed factor is equally specific for the target rpoA site when expressed in chloroplasts and in the bacterium E. coli. This study serves as a successful pilot into the design and application of programmable RNA editing factors based on plant PPR proteins.

Indexed as

RNA EditingArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBacterial ProteinsChloroplastsEscherichia coliRNA, BacterialRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, PlantArabidopsis ProteinsBacterial ProteinsRNA, BacterialRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID33972654
PMCPMC8110955
OpenAlexW3108160478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.