Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972575›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Automatic wavelet-based 3D nuclei segmentation and analysis for multicellular embryo quantification.

Tzu-Ching Wu, Xu Wang, Linlin Li, Ye Bu, David M Umulis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tzu-Ching Wu *Department of Agriculture and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Xu Wang *Department of Agriculture and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Linlin LiWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Ye BuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
David M UmulisDepartment of Agriculture and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. dumulis@purdue.edu.

Funding

Modeling and analysis of BMP-mediated Dorsal/Ventral patterning in zebrafish embryosR01GM132501 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI UMULIS, DAVID MICHAEL · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01HD073156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of individual cells in tissues, organs, and in various developing systems is a well-studied problem because it is an essential part of objectively analyzing quantitative images in numerous biological contexts. We developed a size-dependent wavelet-based segmentation method that provides robust segmentation without any preprocessing, filtering or fine-tuning steps, and is robust to the signal-to-noise ratio. The wavelet-based method achieves robust segmentation results with respect to True Positive rate, Precision, and segmentation accuracy compared with other commonly used methods. We applied the segmentation program to zebrafish embryonic development IN TOTO for nuclei segmentation, image registration, and nuclei shape analysis. These new approaches to segmentation provide a means to carry out quantitative patterning analysis with single-cell precision throughout three dimensional tissues and embryos and they have a high tolerance for non-uniform and noisy image data sets.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusAlgorithmsAnimalsDevelopmental BiologyEmbryo, NonmammalianImaging, Three-DimensionalIntravital MicroscopyModels, AnimalSignal-To-Noise RatioSpatio-Temporal AnalysisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID33972575
PMCPMC8110989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.