Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972446›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Novel functional sequences uncovered through a bovine multiassembly graph.

Danang Crysnanto, Alexander S Leonard, Zih-Hua Fang, Hubert Pausch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A comparative study on recombination activity in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The chromosome-level genome of Chinese indicine cattle breed provides insights into bovine adaptation and immunity.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danang CrysnantoAnimal Genomics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, 8315 Zürich, Switzerland danang.crysnanto@usys.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4444-9371
Alexander S LeonardAnimal Genomics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, 8315 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8425-5630
Zih-Hua FangAnimal Genomics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, 8315 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-8772
Hubert PauschAnimal Genomics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, 8315 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0501-6760
Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many genomic analyses start by aligning sequencing reads to a linear reference genome. However, linear reference genomes are imperfect, lacking millions of bases of unknown relevance and are unable to reflect the genetic diversity of populations. This makes reference-guided methods susceptible to reference-allele bias. To overcome such limitations, we build a pangenome from six reference-quality assemblies from taurine and indicine cattle as well as yak. The pangenome contains an additional 70,329,827 bases compared to the

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFemaleMaleWhole Genome Sequencinggenetic diversitygenome graphspangenomereference genome

Identifiers

PMID33972446
PMCPMC8157972
OpenAlexW3162276363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.