Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972343›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Opioid maintenance treatment in the Czech Republic, Norway and Denmark: a study protocol of a comparative registry linkage study.

Roman Gabrhelík, Marte Handal, Viktor Mravčík, Blanka Nechanská, Christian Tjagvad, Birgitte Thylstrup, Morten Hesse, Jakub Minařík, Jiří Jarkovský, Anne Bukten and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Roman GabrhelíkDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic roman.gabrhelik@lf1.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-7672-3753
Marte HandalDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Viktor MravčíkDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Blanka NechanskáDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Christian TjagvadNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Birgitte ThylstrupCentre For Alcohol And Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten HesseCentre For Alcohol And Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakub MinaříkDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří JarkovskýDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anne BuktenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas ClausenNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Svetlana SkurtveitNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpioid maintenance treatment (OMT) varies across settings and between countries. We plan to use data from several nationwide health and population registers to further improve the knowledge base established from earlier studies. Our aim is to study OMT adherence trajectories and to identify factors associated with improved outcomes for OMT patients across the Czech Republic, Norway and Denmark, in order to further improve OMT and our understanding of the key elements of treatment success. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The registry-based cohort approach across the three countries allows us to link data from a range of registers on the individual level, by using personal identifiers in nationwide cohorts of OMT and non-OMT patients and the general non-using populations. A total of ~21 500 OMT patients over the last two decades in all three countries will be included in the study. The following outcome variables (based on the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes) will be obtained from relevant registers: treatment adherence to OMT, comorbidity (somatic and mental health), and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Outcomes of the country-specific analyses will be pooled. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The national OMT cohorts have been approved by the ethics committees in the respective countries. Data will be stored according to national and local guidelines and treated confidentially, and all data will be analysed separately for each country and compared across countries. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals, national and international conferences, and in briefings to inform clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersCzech RepublicDenmarkHumansNorwayRegistrieshealth & safetypublic healthsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID33972343
PMCPMC8112418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.