Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972337›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Minimum acceptable diet and associated factors among infants and young children aged 6-23 months in Amhara region, Central Ethiopia: community-based cross-sectional study.

Abebaw Molla, Gudina Egata, Lemma Getacher, Bezie Kebede, Alemayehu Sayih, Mikyas Arega, Agegnehu Bante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abebaw MollaSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia abebawtsehay1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-6449
Gudina EgataSchool of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Lemma GetacherDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences Debre Birhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-9237-117X
Bezie KebedeSchool of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia.
Alemayehu SayihDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia.
Mikyas AregaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences Debre Birhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
Agegnehu BanteSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0583-6635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe main objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of a minimum acceptable diet (MAD) and associated factors.

designCommunity-based cross-sectional study

settingDebre Berhan Town, Ethiopia.

participantsAn aggregate of 531 infants and young children mother/caregiver pairs participated in this study. A one-stage cluster sampling method was used to select study participants and clusters were selected using a lottery method. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all study variables. Statistical analysis was performed on data to determine which variables are associated with MAD and the results of the adjusted OR with 95% CI. P value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Prevalence of MAD and associated factors

resultsThe overall prevalence of MAD was 31.6% (95% CI: 27.7 to 35.2). Having mother attending secondary (adjusted OR, AOR=4.9, 95% CI: 1.3 to 18.9) and college education (AOR=6.4, 95% CI: 1.5 to 26.6), paternal primary education (AOR=1.3, 95% CI: 1.5 to 2.4), grouped in the aged group of 12-17 months (AOR=1.8, 95% CI: (1.0 to 3.4) and 18-23 months (AOR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.9), having four antenatal care (ANC) visits (AOR=2.0, 95% CI: 1.0 to 3.9), utilising growth monitoring (AOR=1.8, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.9), no history of illness 2 weeks before the survey (AOR=2.9, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.0) and living in the household with home garden (AOR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.3) were positively associated with increase the odds of MAD.

conclusionGenerally, the result of this study showed that the prevalence of minimum acceptable was very low. Parent educational status, ANC visits, infant and young child feeding advice, child growth monitoring practice, age of a child, a child has no history of illness 2 weeks before the survey, and home gardening practice were the predictors of MAD. Therefore, comprehensive intervention strategies suitable to the local context are required to improve the provision of MAD.

Indexed as

DietPrenatal CareChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMothersPregnancycommunity child healthnutrition & dieteticspublic health

Identifiers

PMID33972337
PMCPMC8112428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.