Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972242›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Pharmacokinetics and Antifungal Activity of Echinocandins in Ascites Fluid of Critically Ill Patients.

René Welte, Herbert Oberacher, Tiziana Gasperetti, Hartwig Pfisterer, Andrea Griesmacher, Tobias Santner, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Caroline Hörtnagl, Sandra Leitner-Rupprich, Maria Aigner and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Role of liposomal amphotericin B in intensive care unit: an expert opinion paper.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

René WelteClinical Pharmacokinetics Unit, Division of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Herbert OberacherInstitute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tiziana GasperettiClinical Pharmacokinetics Unit, Division of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Hartwig PfistererCentral Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Innsbruck General Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andrea GriesmacherCentral Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Innsbruck General Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tobias SantnerCentral Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Innsbruck General Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria.
Cornelia Lass-FlörlDepartment of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Caroline HörtnaglDepartment of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sandra Leitner-RupprichDepartment of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Maria AignerDepartment of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ingo LorenzGeneral and Surgical ICU, Department of General and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Center of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan SchmidTraumatological ICU, Department of General and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Center of Operative Medicine, Innsbruck General Hospital and Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael EdlingerDivision of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philipp EllerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Daniel DanklSalzburg General Hospital and Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Romuald BellmannClinical Pharmacokinetics Unit, Division of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity Hospital Innsbruck · ATMedical University of Graz · ATParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and antifungal activity of the echinocandins anidulafungin (AFG), micafungin (MFG), and caspofungin (CAS) were assessed in ascites fluid and plasma of critically ill adults treated for suspected or proven invasive candidiasis. Ascites fluid was obtained from ascites drains or during paracentesis. The antifungal activity of the echinocandins in ascites fluid was assessed by incubation of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata at concentrations of 0.03 to 16.00 μg/ml. In addition, ascites fluid samples obtained from our study patients were inoculated with the same isolates and evaluated for fungal growth. These patient samples had to be spiked with echinocandins to restore the original concentrations because echinocandins had been lost during sterile filtration. In ascites fluid specimens of 29 patients, echinocandin concentrations were below the simultaneous plasma levels. Serial sampling in 20 patients revealed a slower rise and decline of echinocandin concentrations in ascites fluid than in plasma. Proliferation of C. albicans in ascites fluid was slower than in culture medium and growth of C. glabrata was lacking, even in the absence of antifungals. In CAS-spiked ascites fluid samples, fungal CFU counts moderately declined, whereas spiking with AFG or MFG had no relevant effect. In ascites fluid of our study patients, echinocandin concentrations achieved by therapeutic doses did not result in a consistent eradication of C. albicans or C. glabrata. Thus, therapeutic doses of AFG, MFG, or CAS may result in ascites fluid concentrations preventing relevant proliferation of C. albicans and C. glabrata, but do not warrant reliable eradication.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsEchinocandinsAdultAscitesCritical IllnessHumansLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesantifungal pharmacodynamicsantifungalsfungal peritonitisinvasive candidiasistarget-site pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID33972242
PMCPMC8218616
OpenAlexW3158038704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.