Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33972238›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2021

Amikacin Combined with Fosfomycin for Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in the Setting of Highly Prevalent Antimicrobial Resistance.

Christopher A Darlow, Fernando Docobo-Perez, Nicola Farrington, Adam Johnson, Laura McEntee, Jennifer Unsworth, Ana Jimenez-Valverde, Silke Gastine, Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona, Renata M A de Costa and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cell Envelope Stress Response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher A DarlowAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fernando Docobo-PerezDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Nicola FarringtonAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Adam JohnsonAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Laura McEnteeAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jennifer UnsworthAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Ana Jimenez-ValverdeAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Silke GastineGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-DonaDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Renata M A de CostaGlobal Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sally EllisGlobal Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
François FranceschiGlobal Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph F StandingGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mike SharlandPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael NeelyChildren's Hospital Los Angeles and the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Laura PiddockGlobal Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shampa DasAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
William HopeAntimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBGlobal Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership · CHGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M008665/1Medical Research Council MR/N025989/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (particularly through extended-spectrum β-lactamase and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme production) in neonatal sepsis is a global problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, with significant mortality rates. High rates of resistance are reported for the current WHO-recommended first-line antibiotic regimen for neonatal sepsis, i.e., ampicillin and gentamicin. We assessed the utility of fosfomycin and amikacin as a potential alternative regimen to be used in settings of increasingly prevalent antimicrobial resistance. The combination was studied in a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) experiment. The combination of amikacin and fosfomycin enhanced bactericidal activity and prevented the emergence of resistance, compared to monotherapy with either antibiotic. Modeling of the experimental quantitative outputs and data from checkerboard assays indicated synergy. We further assessed the combination regimen at clinically relevant doses in the HFIM with nine

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinNeonatal SepsisAmikacinDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinamikacinaminoglycosidesantimicrobial resistancecombination antibioticsfosfomycinhollow fibermathematical modellingneonatal sepsispharmacodynamicssynergy

Identifiers

PMID33972238
PMCPMC8373250
OpenAlexW3159338233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.