ReviewObstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America2021
Fetal Growth Curves: Is There a Universal Reference?
Review in Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neonatal mortality risk of vulnerable newborns: A descriptive analysis of subnational, population-based birth cohorts for 238 203 live births in low- and middle-income settings from 2000 to 2017.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Foetal growth in pregnant women with HIV.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Multiethnic growth standards for fetal body composition and organ volumes derived from 3D ultrasonography.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Early respiratory features of small for gestational age very preterm children.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Should a single growth standard be used to judge the nutritional status of children under age 5 years globally: Yes.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Unified standard for fetal growth: the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Three modern cohort studies have an advantage over historical fetal growth references because they included diverse populations. Despite similar inclusion criteria, estimated fetal weight percentiles for gestational age varied among studies, which result in different proportions of fetuses as being classified below or above a cutoff point. A universal reference would make comparison of fetal growth simpler for clinical use and for comparison across populations but may misclassify small-for-gestational-age or large-for-gestational-age fetuses. It is important to know how a growth reference performs in a local population in relation to fetal morbidity and mortality when implementing in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.