Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971926›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Validating online approaches for rare disease research using latent class mixture modeling.

Andrew A Dwyer, Ziwei Zeng, Christopher S Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04733274 (Patient and Healthcare Professional Views on Genetic/Genomic Information and Testing), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04733274 active not recruitingnot on this map

Patient and Healthcare Professional Views on Genetic/Genomic Information and Testing

TypeobservationalSponsorBoston CollegeRan2018 to 2025Enrolled227ConditionsHypogonadism, Hypogonadotropic, Kallmann Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Nursing's Role in Advancing Care for Rare Genetic Diseases.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andrew A DwyerBoston College Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA. andrew.dwyer@bc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7023-6794
Ziwei ZengBoston College Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Center for Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics and Assessment, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Christopher S LeeBoston College Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Boston College · US

Funding

The Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Center for Reproductive MedicineP50HD104224 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SEMINARA, STEPHANIE BETH · 2021 to 2025
$7.8M
Identifying predictors of reversible congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadismR03TR003533 · NCATS · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI DWYER, ANDREW ALOIS · 2020 to 2021
$157k
NCATS NIH HHS R03 TR003533NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD104224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare disease patients are geographically dispersed, posing challenges to research. Some researchers have partnered with patient organizations and used web-based approaches to overcome geographic recruitment barriers. Critics of such methods claim that samples are homogenous and do not represent the broader patient population-as patients recruited from patient organizations are thought to have high levels of needs. We applied latent class mixture modeling (LCMM) to define patient clusters based on underlying characteristics. We used previously collected data from a cohort of patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism who were recruited online in collaboration with a patient organization. Patient demographics, clinical information, Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) scores and Zung self-rating depression Scale (SDS) were used as variables for LCMM analysis. Specifically, we aimed to test the classic critique that patients recruited online in collaboration with a patient organization are a homogenous group with high needs. We hypothesized that distinct classes (clinical profiles) of patients could be identified-thereby demonstrating the validity of online recruitment and supporting transferability of findings.

resultsIn total, 154 patients with CHH were included. The LCMM analysis identified three distinct subgroups (Class I: n = 84 [54.5%], Class II: n = 41 [26.6%], Class III: n = 29 [18.8%]) that differed significantly in terms of age, education, disease consequences, emotional consequences, illness coherence and depression symptoms (all p < 0.001) as well as age at diagnosis (p = 0.045). Classes depict a continuum of psychosocial impact ranging from severe to relatively modest. Additional analyses revealed later diagnosis (Class I: 19.2 ± 6.7 years [95% CI 17.8-20.7]) is significantly associated with worse psychological adaptation and coping as assessed by disease consequences, emotional responses, making sense of one's illness and SDS depressive symptoms (all p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe identify three distinct classes of patients who were recruited online in collaboration with a patient organization. Findings refute prior critiques of patient partnership and web-based recruitment for rare disease research. This is the first empirical data suggesting negative psychosocial sequelae of later diagnosis ("diagnostic odyssey") often observed in CHH.

Indexed as

HypogonadismRare DiseasesAdaptation, PsychologicalDisease ProgressionHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity based participatory researchDiagnostic odysseyHypogonadotropic hypogonadismKallmann syndromePatient organizationRare disease

Identifiers

PMID33971926
PMCPMC8108361
OpenAlexW3138035602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.