Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971912›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Effects of a robot-aided somatosensory training on proprioception and motor function in stroke survivors.

I-Ling Yeh, Jessica Holst-Wolf, Naveen Elangovan, Anna Vera Cuppone, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, Leonardo Cappello, Lorenzo Masia, Jürgen Konczak

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02565407 (Robot-aided Proprioceptive Rehabilitation Training With Additional Vibro-tactile Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02565407 nacompletednot on this map

Robot-aided Proprioceptive Rehabilitation Training With Additional Vibro-tactile Feedback

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2015 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsStroke, Peripheral Sensory NeuropathyArmsProprioceptive training, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Visual Information Quantity in Fine Motor Performance.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

I-Ling YehHealth and Social Sciences Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-8682
Jessica Holst-WolfHuman Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Naveen ElangovanHuman Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Anna Vera CupponeDepartment of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.
Kamakshi LakshminarayanDepartment of Neurology and School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Leonardo CappelloThe BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
Lorenzo MasiaInstitut für Technische Informatik, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. lorenzo.masia@ziti.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-7139
Jürgen KonczakHuman Sensorimotor Control Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4422-5610
University of Minnesota · USHeidelberg University · DEItalian Institute of Technology · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITSingapore Institute of Technology · SG

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
MIN-REACH Research Evaluation and Commercialization HubU01HL127479 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GURVICH, VADIM J., HUBEL, ALLISON · 2015 to 2017
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000114NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL127479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProprioceptive deficits after stroke are associated with poor upper limb function, slower motor recovery, and decreased self-care ability. Improving proprioception should enhance motor control in stroke survivors, but current evidence is inconclusive. Thus, this study examined whether a robot-aided somatosensory-based training requiring increasingly accurate active wrist movements improves proprioceptive acuity as well as motor performance in chronic stroke.

methodsTwelve adults with chronic stroke completed a 2-day training (age range: 42-74 years; median time-after-stroke: 12 months; median Fugl-Meyer UE: 65). Retention was assessed at Day 5. Grasping the handle of a wrist-robotic exoskeleton, participants trained to roll a virtual ball to a target through continuous wrist adduction/abduction movements. During training vision was occluded, but participants received real-time, vibro-tactile feedback on their forearm about ball position and speed. Primary outcome was the just-noticeable-difference (JND) wrist position sense threshold as a measure of proprioceptive acuity. Secondary outcomes were spatial error in an untrained wrist tracing task and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) as a neural correlate of proprioceptive function. Ten neurologically-intact adults were recruited to serve as non-stroke controls for matched age, gender and hand dominance (age range: 44 to 79 years; 6 women, 4 men).

resultsParticipants significantly reduced JND thresholds at posttest and retention (Stroke group: pretest: mean: 1.77° [SD: 0.54°] to posttest mean: 1.38° [0.34°]; Control group: 1.50° [0.46°] to posttest mean: 1.45° [SD: 0.54°]; F[2,37] = 4.54, p = 0.017, η

conclusionsThis study provides proof-of-concept that non-visual, proprioceptive training can induce fast, measurable improvements in proprioceptive function in chronic stroke survivors. There is encouraging but inconclusive evidence that such somatosensory learning transfers to untrained motor tasks. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov; Registration ID: NCT02565407; Date of registration: 01/10/2015; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02565407 .

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProof of Concept StudyProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceRoboticsSensation DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationSurvivorsWrist JointCerebrovascular disease/strokeHumanRehabilitationSomatosensationUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID33971912
PMCPMC8112068
OpenAlexW3162537857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.