Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971851›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Measuring cost and affordability of current vs. healthy diets in Argentina: an application of linear programming and the INFORMAS protocol.

Gabriel Giacobone, Maria Victoria Tiscornia, Leila Guarnieri, Luciana Castronuovo, Sally Mackay, Lorena Allemandi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EAT-Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriel GiacoboneFIC Argentina, Arévalo 2364 1A, 1425, CABA, Argentina.
Maria Victoria TiscorniaFIC Argentina, Arévalo 2364 1A, 1425, CABA, Argentina.
Leila GuarnieriFIC Argentina, Arévalo 2364 1A, 1425, CABA, Argentina.
Luciana CastronuovoFIC Argentina, Arévalo 2364 1A, 1425, CABA, Argentina. luciana.castronuovo@ficargentina.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1883-6741
Sally MackaySchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Lorena AllemandiFIC Argentina, Arévalo 2364 1A, 1425, CABA, Argentina.
Syngenta (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

International Development Research Centre 108643-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood cost and affordability is one of the main barriers to improve the nutritional quality of diets of the population. However, in Argentina, where over 60% of adults and 40% of children and adolescents are overweight or obese, little is known about the difference in cost and affordability of healthier diets compared to ordinary, less healthy ones.

methodsWe implemented the "optimal approach" proposed by the International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS). We modelled the current diet and two types of healthy diets, one equal in energy with the current diet and one 6.3% lower in energy by linear programming. Cost estimations were performed by collecting food product prices and running a Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) to obtain a range of costs for each model diet. Affordability was measured as the percentage contribution of diet cost vs. average household income in average, poor and extremely poor households and by income deciles.

resultsOn average, households must spend 32% more money on food to ensure equal energy intake from a healthy diet than from a current model diet. When the energy intake target was reduced by 6.3%, the difference in cost was 22%. There are no reasonably likely situations in which any of these healthy diets could cost less or the same than the current unhealthier one. Over 50% of households would be unable to afford the modelled healthy diets, while 40% could not afford the current diet.

conclusionsDifferential cost and affordability of healthy vs. unhealthy diets are germane to the design of effective public policies to reduce obesity and NCDs in Argentina. It is necessary to implement urgent measures to transform the obesogenic environment, making healthier products more affordable, available and desirable, and discouraging consumption of nutrient-poor, energy-rich foods.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyProgramming, LinearAdolescentAdultArgentinaChildCosts and Cost AnalysisDietFoodHumansCosts and cost analysisDietFiscal policyNoncommunicable diseasesNutrition policyObesityPublic health

Identifiers

PMID33971851
PMCPMC8111730
OpenAlexW3161954875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.