Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971847›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Life under lockdown and social restrictions - the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.

Remco Tuijt, Rachael Frost, Jane Wilcock, Louise Robinson, Jill Manthorpe, Greta Rait, Kate Walters

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05290909 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of Blended and Problem-based Learning to Improve the Geriatric Nursing of Critical Thinking and Ethical Competence Among Nursing Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsNarrative EthicsArmsThe protocol of blended and problem-based learning, The traditional problem-oriented teaching model
NCT05341271 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Digital Reminiscence Therapy on People With Mild and Moderate Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled186ConditionsDementiaArmsExperimental: digital reminiscence group (DRG), Experimental: general reminiscence group (GRG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Satisfaction with remote consultations in primary care during COVID-19: a population survey of UK adults.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Social support services for dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal survey exploring service adaptations in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Remco TuijtResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK. r.tuijt@ucl.ac.uk.
Rachael FrostResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Jane WilcockResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Louise RobinsonNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jill ManthorpeKing's College London, London, UK.
Greta RaitResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Kate WaltersResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of COVID-19 restrictions on people living with dementia and their carers is an emerging focus of recent research determining how we can best support this population. People living with dementia have faced service curtailment, increased risk for COVID-19, as well as potential heightened deterioration. This study reports the experiences of people living with dementia and their family carers during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in England and the impact on them.

methodsWe recruited and remotely interviewed 30 people living with dementia in their own homes and 31 family carers, via video or telephone call in mid-2020. Data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsPeople living with dementia often had a basic understanding of COVID-19 restrictions but could have difficulty translating this into personalised risk-appraisal of their own actions. Managing COVID-19 risks facing people living with dementia at home was largely done by family carers, exemplified by changes to living arrangements, which could strain or sustain caring relationships. Well-established familial caring relationships contributed to the wellbeing of the person living with dementia and their carer, as well as keeping to simple routines that included leaving the home for exercise and stimulation. People living with dementia reported some negative psychological and cognitive effects due to the imposed restrictions, such as increased apathy, irritability, or anxiety, which were fuelled by lack of social engagement.

conclusionsStructuring routine (remote) social interactions where possible could increase social engagement and improve wellbeing for people living with dementia, especially those with limited familial support in a post-COVID-19 context. As some care relationships had been restructured to manage COVID-19 risks, additional carer strain may emerge as a result of the impact on the independence of the person living with dementia and come to the attention of professionals in health and care services. People living with dementia and their carers highlighted the importance of maintaining or adapting routines which may be useful learning for professionals, although additional support may be necessary for those who are impacted by more severe or worsening symptoms of dementia.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaCaregiversCommunicable Disease ControlEnglandHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CarersCOVID-19DementiaQualitative ResearchSocial engagementSocial restrictions

Identifiers

PMID33971847
PMCPMC8107803
OpenAlexW3161913891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.