Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971845›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

No evidence to support the impact of migration background on treatment response rates and cancer survival: a retrospective matched-pair analysis in Germany.

Roman Rüdiger, Franziska Geiser, Manuel Ritter, Peter Brossart, Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik, Andree Faridi, Hartmut Vatter, Friedrich Bootz, Jennifer Landsberg, Jörg C Kalff and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Roman RüdigerDepartment of Integrated Oncology, CIO Bonn, Center for Integrated Oncology ABCD, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Franziska GeiserInstitute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Manuel RitterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Peter BrossartDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Mignon-Denise Keyver-PaikDepartment of Senology and certified Breast Center, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andree FaridiDepartment of Senology and certified Breast Center, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hartmut VatterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Friedrich BootzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jennifer LandsbergDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jörg C KalffDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrich HerrlingerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Glen KristiansenInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Torsten PietschDepartment of Neuropathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan AretzInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel ThomasDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Franz-Josef KramerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christian P StrassburgDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maria Gonzalez-CarmonaDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dirk SkowaschDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias SchmidInstitute for Medical Biometry, Computer Science and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jennifer NadalInstitute for Medical Biometry, Computer Science and Epidemiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nicole ErnstmannCenter for Health Communication and Health Services Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Amit SharmaDepartment of Integrated Oncology, CIO Bonn, Center for Integrated Oncology ABCD, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Benjamin FunkeDepartment of Integrated Oncology, CIO Bonn, Center for Integrated Oncology ABCD, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Ingo G H Schmidt-WolfDepartment of Integrated Oncology, CIO Bonn, Center for Integrated Oncology ABCD, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. Ingo.Schmidt-Wolf@ukb.uni-bonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmigration has taken the central stage in world politics, especially in the developed countries like Germany, where the continuous flow of immigrants has been well documented since 1960s. Strikingly, emerging data suggest that migrant patients have a poorer response to the treatment and lower survival rates in their new host country, raising concerns about health disparities. Herein, we present our investigation on the treatment response rate and cancer survival in German patients with and without an immigrant background that were treated at our comprehensive cancer center in Germany.

methodsInitially, we considered 8162 cancer patients treated at the Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital Bonn, Germany (April 2002-December 2015) for matched-pair analysis. Subsequently, the German patients with a migration background and those from the native German population were manually identified and catalogued using a highly specific name-based algorithm. The clinical parameters such as demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, defined staging criteria, and primary therapy were further adjusted. Using these stringent criteria, a total of 422 patients (n = 211, Germans with migration background; n = 211, native German population) were screened to compare for the treatment response and survival rates (i.e., 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and time to progression).

resultsCompared to the cohort with migration background, the cohort without migration background was slightly older (54.9 vs. 57.9 years) while having the same sex distribution (54.5% vs. 55.0% female) and longer follow-up time (36.9 vs. 42.6 months). We did not find significant differences in cancer survival (5-year overall survival, P = 0.771) and the response rates (Overall Remission Rate; McNemar's test, P = 0.346) between both collectives.

conclusionContrary to prior reports, we found no significant differences in cancer survival between German patients with immigrant background and native German patients. Nevertheless, the advanced treatment protocols implemented at our comprehensive cancer center may possibly account for the low variance in outcome. To conduct similar studies with a broader perspective, we propose that certain risk factors (country-of-origin-specific infections, dietary habits, epigenetics for chronic diseases etc.) should be considered, specially in the future studies that will recruit new arrivals from the 2015 German refugee crisis.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsMatched-Pair AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCancerComprehensive cancer centerGermanyMatched-pair analysisMigration backgroundResponse rateSocioeconomic statusSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33971845
PMCPMC8108356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.