Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971829›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Employment and retirement impacts on health and wellbeing among a sample of rural Australians.

Tonelle E Handley, Terry J Lewin, Peter Butterworth, Brian J Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Daily Mobility and Social Interactions Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Pet Dogs: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tonelle E HandleyCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. tonelle.handley@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8284-2759
Terry J LewinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Peter ButterworthCentre for Research on Ageing, Health & Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Brian J KellySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUAustralian National University · AUCentre for Rural and Remote Mental Health · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 401241National Health and Medical Research Council 631061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, it is projected that one in four individuals will be at the nominal retirement age of 65 or over by 2056; this effect is expected to be especially pronounced in rural areas. Previous findings on the effects of retirement on wellbeing have been mixed. The present study explores the effects of employment and retirement on health and wellbeing among a sample of rural Australians.

methodsAustralian Rural Mental Health Study participants who were aged 45 or over (N = 2013) were included in a series of analyses to compare the health and wellbeing of individuals with differing employment and retirement circumstances. Self-reported outcome variables included perceived physical health and everyday functioning, financial wellbeing, mental health, relationships, and satisfaction with life.

resultsAcross the outcomes, participants who were employed or retired generally reported better health and wellbeing than those not in the workforce. Retired participants rated more highly than employed participants on mental health, relationships, and satisfaction with life. There was also a short-term benefit for perceived financial status for retired participants compared to employed participants, but this effect diminished over time.

conclusionsWhile retirement is a significant life transition that may affect multiple facets of an individual's life, the direction and magnitude of these effects vary depending on the retirement context, namely the pre-retirement and concurrent circumstances within which an individual is retiring. Personal perceptions of status changes may also contribute to an individual's wellbeing more so than objective factors such as income. Policies that promote rural work/retirement opportunities and diversity and address rural disadvantage are needed.

Indexed as

EmploymentRetirementAustraliaHumansIncomeMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionAgeingEmploymentMental healthRetirementRuralWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID33971829
PMCPMC8108016
OpenAlexW3160264310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.