Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971809›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Predicting venous thromboembolism in hospitalized trauma patients: a combination of the Caprini score and data-driven machine learning model.

Lingxiao He, Lei Luo, Xiaoling Hou, Dengbin Liao, Ran Liu, Chaowei Ouyang, Guanglin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An abbreviated Caprini model for VTE risk assessment in trauma.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lingxiao HeTrauma Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Road 37#, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lei LuoCollege of Chemical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoling HouTrauma Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Road 37#, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Dengbin LiaoTrauma Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Road 37#, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Ran LiuEngineering Research Center of Medical Information Technology, Ministry of Education, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chaowei OuyangTrauma Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Road 37#, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Guanglin WangTrauma Center of West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Guo Xue Road 37#, Chengdu, 610041, China. wglfrank@163.com.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of hospitalized trauma patients and has an adverse impact on patient outcomes. However, there is still a lack of appropriate tools for effectively predicting VTE for trauma patients. We try to verify the accuracy of the Caprini score for predicting VTE in trauma patients, and further improve the prediction through machine learning algorithms.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed emergency trauma patients who were admitted to a trauma center in a tertiary hospital from September 2019 to March 2020. The data in the patient's electronic health record (EHR) and the Caprini score were extracted, combined with multiple feature screening methods and the random forest (RF) algorithm to constructs the VTE prediction model, and compares the prediction performance of (1) using only Caprini score; (2) using EHR data to build a machine learning model; (3) using EHR data and Caprini score to build a machine learning model. True Positive Rate (TPR), False Positive Rate (FPR), Area Under Curve (AUC), accuracy, and precision were reported.

resultsThe Caprini score shows a good VTE prediction effect on the trauma hospitalized population when the cut-off point is 11 (TPR = 0.667, FPR = 0.227, AUC = 0.773), The best prediction model is LASSO+RF model combined with Caprini Score and other five features extracted from EHR data (TPR = 0.757, FPR = 0.290, AUC = 0.799).

conclusionThe Caprini score has good VTE prediction performance in trauma patients, and the use of machine learning methods can further improve the prediction performance.

Indexed as

Machine LearningVenous ThromboembolismHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsWounds and InjuriesMachine learningModels, statisticalRisk assessmentVenous thromboembolismWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID33971809
PMCPMC8111727
OpenAlexW3163159417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.