ArticleBioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021
Growth environment influences B16.F10 mouse melanoma cell response to gene electrotransfer.
Article in Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA Electrotransfer Regulates Molecular Functions in Skeletal Muscle.Bioelectricity · 2024Review
- Effect of Experimental Electrical and Biological Parameters on Gene Transfer by Electroporation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Extracellular matrix stiffness mediates radiosensitivity in a 3D nasopharyngeal carcinoma model.Cancer cell international · 2022Article
- Acute Effects of Intratumor DNA Electrotransfer.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We developed and characterized a 3D collagen hydrogel model for B16.F10 melanoma tumors. Cells in this 3D environment exhibited lower proliferation than cells in the conventional 2D culture environment. Interestingly, the basal expression levels of several genes varied when compared to conventionally grown cells. In each growth environment, a significant number of melanoma cells were transfected by plasmid electroporation (electrotransfer), although expression could only be ascertained on the surface of the 3D constructs. Cellular responses to plasmid entry as demonstrated by pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine upregulation varied based on the growth environment, as did the mRNA levels of several putative DNA-specific pattern recognition receptors (DNA sensors). Unexpectedly, when plasmid DNA was delivered while cells where attached in the 2D or 3D environments, the mRNAs of the DNA sensor p204 and the inflammatory mediator TNFα were regulated in cells receiving pulses only. However, we were unable to confirm coordinate upregulation of TNFα and p204 proteins. This study confirms that cell responses differ significantly based on their environment, and demonstrates the difficulty of extending experimental observations between cell environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.