Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971132›Full record

Trial reportEnvironmental research2021

Making the invisible visible: Developing and evaluating an intervention to raise awareness and reduce lead exposure among children and their caregivers in rural Bangladesh.

Tania Jahir, Helen O Pitchik, Mahbubur Rahman, Jesmin Sultana, A K M Shoab, Tarique Md Nurul Huda, Kendra A Byrd, Md Saiful Islam, Farzana Yeasmin, Musa Baker and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Environmental research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Tania JahirEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Helen O PitchikUniversity of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mahbubur RahmanEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jesmin SultanaEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
A K M ShoabEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tarique Md Nurul HudaEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kendra A ByrdWorldFish, 11960 Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia.
Md Saiful IslamEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh; School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Farzana YeasminEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Musa BakerEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dalia YeasminEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Syeda NurunnaharEmerging Infections, Icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Stephen P LubyStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Peter J WinchJohn Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jenna E ForsythStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: jforsyth@stanford.edu.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDStanford University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USWorldFish · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lead exposure is harmful at any time in life, but pre-natal and early childhood exposures are particularly detrimental to cognitive development. In Bangladesh, multiple household-level lead exposures pose risks, including turmeric adulterated with lead chromate and food storage in lead-soldered cans. We developed and evaluated an intervention to reduce lead exposure among children and their caregivers in rural Bangladesh. We conducted formative research to inform theory-based behavioral recommendations. Lead exposure was one of several topics covered in the multi-component intervention focused on early child development. Community health workers (CHWs) delivered the lead component of the intervention during group sessions with pregnant women and mother-child dyads (<15 months old) in a cluster-randomized trial. We administered household surveys at baseline (control n = 301; intervention n = 320) and 9 months later at endline (control n = 279; intervention n = 239) and calculated adjusted risk and mean differences for primary outcomes. We conducted two qualitative assessments, one after 3 months and a second after 9 months, to examine the feasibility and benefits of the intervention. At endline, the prevalence of lead awareness was 52 percentage points higher in the intervention arm compared to the control (adjusted risk difference: 0.52 [95% CI 0.46 to 0.61]). Safe turmeric consumption and food storage practices were more common in the intervention versus control arm at endline, with adjusted risk differences of 0.22 [0.10 to 0.32] and 0.13 [0.00 to 0.19], respectively. Semi-structured interviews conducted with a subset of participants after the intervention revealed that the perceived benefit of reducing lead exposure was high because of the long-term negative impacts that lead can have on child cognitive development. The study demonstrates that a group-based CHW-led intervention can effectively raise awareness about and motivate lead exposure prevention behaviors in rural Bangladesh. Future efforts should combine similar awareness-raising efforts with longer-term regulatory and structural changes to systematically and sustainably reduce lead exposure.

Indexed as

CaregiversLeadBangladeshChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantPregnancyRural PopulationLeadChild lead exposureCluster randomized trialHealth education and promotionLead chromateLead-soldered cansNutritionPrenatal lead exposureTurmeric

Identifiers

PMID33971132
PMCPMC8261827
OpenAlexW3161988146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.