Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971067›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Effectiveness of ozone therapy in addition to conventional treatment on mortality in patients with COVID-19.

Şahin Çolak, Burcu Genç Yavuz, Mürsel Yavuz, Burak Özçelik, Metin Öner, Asu Özgültekin, Seniha Şenbayrak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Şahin ÇolakHaydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-9652
Burcu Genç YavuzHaydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-5288
Mürsel YavuzKosuyolu Rezonans Clinic, Integrative Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Burak ÖzçelikHaydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.
Metin ÖnerHaydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2865-9822
Asu ÖzgültekinHaydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4307-9604
Seniha ŞenbayrakHaydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-6613
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRKartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ozone therapy, which is one of the integrative medicine applications that has been used safely for many years, on the prevalence of mortality in patients receiving COVID-19 treatment.

methodsThis was a prospective, controlled study conducted on patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalised. In this study, 55 patients were included. The patients were divided into two groups as the ozone and control group. Ozone therapy (major autohemotherapy) was applied to 37 patients who were being treated with the appropriate COVID-19 treatment protocol determined by the infectious diseases committee of our hospital. The ozone treatment protocol consisted of seven sessions (one session per day) of intravenous ozone administration, applied in a volume of 100 mL and a concentration of 30 μg/mL. Only the conventional COVID-19 treatment protocol was applied to 18 patients in the control group. Clinical follow-up was performed until the discharge of the patients from the hospital with successful treatment or until the mortality occurred. Factors affecting mortality were analysed using univariate regression analysis.

resultsIntensive care unit (ICU) hospitalisation was required in 6 of the 37 patients who were treated with ozone (16.2%), while 4 of 18 patients in the control group required ICU treatment (22.2%) (P = .713). When the mortality rates between the two groups were compared, mortality was lower in the ozone group (P = .032). As a result of univariate logistic regression analysis performed to investigate the factors affecting mortality, treatment with ozone therapy was determined as a risk factor for mortality. Patients receiving ozone therapy appear to have a lower mortality risk (odds ratio [OR]: 0.149, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.026-0.863, P = .034).

conclusionIn this study, the findings suggested that the administration of ozone therapy along with the conventional medical treatment in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 could reduce mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentOzoneHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Ozone

Identifiers

PMID33971067
PMCPMC8236993
OpenAlexW3162260176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.