Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33971029›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021

ADVANCE: Methodology of a qualitative study.

Ruth Palan Lopez, Ellen P McCarthy, Kathleen M Mazor, Meghan Hendricksen, Susan McLennon, Kimberly S Johnson, Susan L Mitchell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ADVANCE-C: A Qualitative Study of Experiences Caring for Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ruth Palan LopezSchool of Nursing, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ellen P McCarthyHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kathleen M MazorMeyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Meghan HendricksenHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan McLennonSchool of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Kimberly S JohnsonDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Susan L MitchellHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USHebrew SeniorLife · USMGH Institute of Health Professions · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

ADVANCE: Assessment of Disparities and Variation for Alzheimer's disease in Nursing home Care at End of LifeR01AG058539 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI LOPEZ, RUTH PALAN, MITCHELL, SUSAN L · 2018 to 2020
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058539NIA NIH HHS R01AG058539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesQuantitative studies have documented persistent regional, facility, and racial differences in the intensity of care provided to nursing home (NH) residents with advanced dementia including, greater intensity in the Southeastern United States, among black residents, and wide variation among NHs in the same hospital referral region (HRR). The reasons for these differences are poorly understood, and the appropriate way to study them is poorly described.

designAssessment of Disparities and Variation for Alzheimer's disease Nursing home Care at End of life (ADVANCE) is a large qualitative study to elucidate factors related to NH organizational culture and proxy perspectives contributing to differences in the intensity of advanced dementia care. Using nationwide 2016-2017 Minimum DataSet information, four HRRs were identified in which the relative intensity of advanced dementia care was high (N = 2 HRRs) and low (N = 2 HRRs) based on hospital transfer and tube-feeding rates among residents with this condition. Within those HRRs, we identified facilities providing high (N = 2 NHs) and low (N = 2 NHs) intensity care relative to all NHs in that HRR (N = 16 total facilities; 4 facilities/HRR). RESULTS/

conclusionsTo date, the research team conducted 275 h of observation in 13 NHs and interviewed 158 NH providers from varied disciplines to assess physical environment, care processes, decision-making processes, and values. We interviewed 44 proxies (black, N = 19; white, N = 25) about their perceptions of advance care planning, decision-making, values, communication, support, trust, literacy, beliefs about death, and spirituality. This report describes ADVANCE study design and the facilitators and challenges of its implementation, providing a template for the successful application of large qualitative studies focused on quality care in NHs.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedAlzheimer DiseaseDatabases, FactualDecision MakingFemaleHomes for the AgedHumansMaleNursing HomesOrganizational CultureProxyQualitative Researchdementiafeeding tubeshospital transferpalliative carequalitative methodology

Identifiers

PMID33971029
PMCPMC8373706
OpenAlexW3162090868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.