Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Long-term comparison between index selection and optimal independent culling in plant breeding programs with genomic prediction.

Lorena G Batista, Robert Chris Gaynor, Gabriel R A Margarido, Tim Byrne, Peter Amer, Gregor Gorjanc, John M Hickey

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using visual scores for genomic prediction of complex traits in breeding programs.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic selection for genotype performance and stability using information on multiple traits and multiple environments.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorena G Batista"Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture (University of São Paulo), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8472-8776
Robert Chris GaynorThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Gabriel R A Margarido"Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture (University of São Paulo), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2327-0201
Tim ByrneAbacusbio, Roslin Innovation Centre, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Peter AmerAbacusbio, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Gregor GorjancThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8008-2787
John M HickeyThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus Research Centre, Midlothian, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of genomic selection, we evaluated and compared breeding programs using either index selection or independent culling for recurrent selection of parents. We simulated a clonally propagated crop breeding program for 20 cycles using either independent culling or an economic index with two unfavourably correlated traits under selection. Cycle time from crossing to selection of parents was kept the same for both strategies. Both methods led to increasingly unfavourable genetic correlations between traits and, compared to independent culling, index selection led to larger changes in the genetic correlation between the two traits. When linkage disequilibrium was not considered, the two methods had similar losses of genetic diversity. Two independent culling approaches were evaluated, one using optimal culling levels and one using the same selection intensity for both traits. Optimal culling levels outperformed the same selection intensity even when traits had the same economic importance. Therefore, accurately estimating optimal culling levels is essential for maximizing gains when independent culling is performed. Once optimal culling levels are achieved, independent culling and index selection lead to comparable genetic gains.

Indexed as

GenomicsPlant BreedingComputer SimulationCrops, AgriculturalQuantitative Trait, HeritableTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID33970915
PMCPMC8109766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.