Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970786›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Changes in legislator vaccine-engagement on Twitter before and after the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Eden Engel-Rebitzer, Daniel Camargo Stokes, Alison Buttenheim, Jonathan Purtle, Zachary F Meisel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eden Engel-RebitzerCenter for Emergency Care Policy and Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Daniel Camargo StokesPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alison ButtenheimSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zachary F MeiselCenter for Emergency Care Policy and Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-7993

Funding

Utilization of health services after engagement with opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment provider by individuals with and without post-traumatic stress disorderP30DA040500 · NIDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ZACHARY Franklin MEISEL · 2015 to 2026
$20.7M
Impact of eliminating nonmedical exemptions in CaliforniaR01AI125405 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, JASON LEE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
ACL HHS R49CE003083NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125405NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA040500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake will be critical to resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. Politicians have the potential to impact vaccine sentiment and uptake through vaccine-related communication with the public. We used tweets (n = 6,201), abstracted from Quorum, a public affairs software platform, to examine changes in the frequency of vaccine-related communication by legislators on the social media platform, Twitter. We found an increase in vaccine-related tweets by legislators following the arrival of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States. In the pre-COVID-19 era the majority of vaccine-related tweets were generated by Democrat and state senators. The increase in tweets following the arrival of COVID-19, however, was greater among Republican and federal legislators than Democrat or state legislators. This suggests that legislators who were previously less engaged in public discussion of vaccination, became engaged following the arrival of SARS-CoV-2, which may have implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake among their followers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinelegislatorspoliticiansSocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33970786
PMCPMC8381804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.