Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970767›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation biology2021

Cohort profile: four early uranium processing facilities in the US and Canada.

Ashley P Golden, Cato M Milder, Elizabeth D Ellis, Jeri L Anderson, John D Boice, Stephen J Bertke, Lydia B Zablotska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashley P GoldenHealth Studies Program, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9430-7702
Cato M MilderDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9400-2095
Elizabeth D EllisHealth Studies Program, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-1587
Jeri L AndersonDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-9326
John D BoiceDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-1299
Stephen J BertkeDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-3816
Lydia B ZablotskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0778-1108

Funding

US and Canadian uranium processing cohorts: exposure, risk and relevanceR21OH011452 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZABLOTSKA, LYDIA B · 2018 to 2019
$367k
ACL HHS R21OH011452Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCEH CDC HHS UE1 EH000989NIOSH CDC HHS R21 OH011452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePooling of individual-level data for workers involved in uranium refining and processing (excluding enrichment) may provide valuable insights into risks from occupational uranium and external ionizing radiation exposures.

methodsData were pooled for workers from four uranium processing facilities (Fernald, Mallinckrodt and Middlesex from the U.S.; and Port Hope, Canada). Employment began as early as the 1930s and follow-up was as late as 2017. Workers were exposed to high concentrations of uranium, radium, and their decay products, as well as gamma radiation and ambient radon decay products. Exposure and outcome data were harmonized using similar definitions and dose reconstruction methods. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were estimated.

resultsIn total, 560 deaths from lung cancer, 503 non-malignant respiratory diseases, 67 renal diseases, 1,596 ischemic heart diseases, and 101 dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) were detected in the pooled cohort of over 12,400 workers (∼1,300 females). Mean cumulative doses were 45 millisievert for whole-body external ionizing radiation exposure and 172 milligray for lung dose from radon decay products. Only SMR for dementia and AD among males was statistically significant (SMR=1.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.54).

conclusionsThis is the largest study to date to examine long-term health risks of uranium processing workers.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureUraniumAdultAgedCanadaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesRadiation DosageUnited StatesUraniumgamma radiationionizing radiationOccupational exposuresuraniumuranium processing workers

Identifiers

PMID33970767
PMCPMC10201456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.