Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33970705›Full record

ArticleAnthropology & medicine2021

The issue is not 'compliance': exploring exposure to malaria vector bites through social dynamics in Burkina Faso.

Federica Guglielmo, Hilary Ranson, N'falé Sagnon, Caroline Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anthropology & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Federica GuglielmoVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1434-2194
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-8247
N'falé SagnonCentre National de Recherche et Formation sur le Paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Caroline JonesKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200222Wellcome Trust 200222/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 203077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Credited with averting almost 68% of new cases between 2000 and 2015, insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) are one of the most efficacious malaria-prevention tools. Their effectiveness, however, depends on if and how they are used, making 'compliance' (and the social factors affecting it) a key area of interest for research on malaria transmission. This article situates the notion of compliance with 'bednet use' within everyday practices in an area of south-west Burkina Faso with high malaria transmission. By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between 2017 and 2018, it critically describes the precarious micro-environments that foreground bednet use-from gender and age to the means of (re)production of social and labour conditions-and assesses the bednets' effectiveness and community uptake. Bednet use stems from concrete, ordinary dynamics that interweave only apparently at the margins of the time individuals most need to be protected by a net. This work conceptualises 'compliance' beyond binary indicators of intervention uptake and locates 'use' as the result of contingent assemblages.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaAnimalsAnthropology, MedicalBurkina FasoHumansMosquito VectorsassemblageBednetscomplianceethnographyexposurelifeways

Identifiers

PMID33970705
PMCPMC7613283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.